Contestation Cafe: A critical perspective on the application of algorithmic decision systems (TAIGA FrAIday talk)

Contestable systems often present their negotiability on their own terms. Rather than questioning their very use and/or application, there is an assumption that automation is inherently progressive and that we, as humans, should fit within these systems’ constraints and maintain them from inside the loop. While maintaining a strong advocacy for the benefits of technology, we can also see how some of these systems adversely affect the marginalised and the disadvantaged, while also suppressing these valuable perspectives. In finding ways to address and potentially leverage these imbalances, this research has reimagined contestation as a form of repair - a lens through which to look at how we might contest the digital intangibles by applying the values of physical repair and some of the strategies of the Right to Repair (R2R) movement. In this presentation we will look at some of the projects and ideas which came out of this exercise and how they might be applied to contestation:Communities: The Contestation CaféRoles: The Fixer vs The RepairerApproaches: Agonistic Design

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-10-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14261317
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Contestation Cafe: A critical perspective on the application of algorithmic decision systems (TAIGA FrAIday talk)

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

Contestation Cafe: A critical perspective on the application of algorithmic decision systems (TAIGA FrAIday talk)

article en

Abstract

Contestable systems often present their negotiability on their own terms. Rather than questioning their very use and/or application, there is an assumption that automation is inherently progressive and that we, as humans, should fit within these systems’ constraints and maintain them from inside the loop. While maintaining a strong advocacy for the benefits of technology, we can also see how some of these systems adversely affect the marginalised and the disadvantaged, while also suppressing these valuable perspectives. In finding ways to address and potentially leverage these imbalances, this research has reimagined contestation as a form of repair - a lens through which to look at how we might contest the digital intangibles by applying the values of physical repair and some of the strategies of the Right to Repair (R2R) movement. In this presentation we will look at some of the projects and ideas which came out of this exercise and how they might be applied to contestation:Communities: The Contestation CaféRoles: The Fixer vs The RepairerApproaches: Agonistic Design

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Umeå University (SE)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.