Architecture and Art from the Ant's Perspective: A Relational Problem

This article revisits and expands a theoretical framework for architectural research originally developed in the early 2010s, in the context of emerging doctoral programmes and institutional recognition of design-led research. The text critically examines the foundations and typologies of research in architecture, articulating disciplinary knowledge and practice-based inquiry. Through a reassessment of classical epistemologies (Bachelard, Popper, Kuhn) in light of contemporary theoretical paradigms (post-structuralism, onto-epistemologies, speculative realism), the article defends the project as a legitimate mode of knowledge production. It also addresses key issues such as validation, the role of drawing as argument, and the articulation of visual, spatial, and narrative components in the dissemination of research results. This revised edition affirms architecture as a field of reflective, ethical, and operational inquiry, contributing to the redefinition of research practices in the twenty-first century.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15245210
Primary Topic
Architecture, Modernity, and Design
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Architecture and Art from the Ant's Perspective: A Relational Problem

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Architecture, Modernity, and Design
article

Architecture and Art from the Ant's Perspective: A Relational Problem

article en

Abstract

This article revisits and expands a theoretical framework for architectural research originally developed in the early 2010s, in the context of emerging doctoral programmes and institutional recognition of design-led research. The text critically examines the foundations and typologies of research in architecture, articulating disciplinary knowledge and practice-based inquiry. Through a reassessment of classical epistemologies (Bachelard, Popper, Kuhn) in light of contemporary theoretical paradigms (post-structuralism, onto-epistemologies, speculative realism), the article defends the project as a legitimate mode of knowledge production. It also addresses key issues such as validation, the role of drawing as argument, and the articulation of visual, spatial, and narrative components in the dissemination of research results. This revised edition affirms architecture as a field of reflective, ethical, and operational inquiry, contributing to the redefinition of research practices in the twenty-first century.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Beira Interior (PT), IDP Ingeniería y Arquitectura Iberia (Spain) (ES)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Architecture, Modernity, and Design
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.