Supporting material: Dose distributions in PT are robust against inferior spatial CT resolution

Article in Medical Physics Title: Dose distributions in PT are robust against inferior spatial CT resolution Abstract: Background: Treatment planning in radiation therapy is performed on image sets acquired with commercial x-ray computed tomography (CT) scanners. Considering an increased frequency of verification scans for adaptive radiation therapy and the advent of alternatives to x-ray CTs, there is a need to review the requirements for image sets used in radiation therapy planning. Purpose: This study aims to derive the required image quality for the computation of the dose distribution in proton therapy (PT) regarding spatial resolution and the combination of spatial resolution and noise. The knowledge gained is used to explore the potential for dose reduction in tomography-guided PT. Methods: Mathematical considerations indicate that the required spatial resolution for dose computation is on the scale of the set-up margins fed into the robust optimization. This hypothesis was tested by processing retrospectively twelve clinical PT cases, which reflect a variety of tumor localizations. Image sets were low-pass filtered and were made noisy in a generic manner. Dose distributions on the modified CT scans were computed with a Monte-Carlo dose engine. The similarity of these dose distributions with clinical ones was quantified with the gamma-index (1 mm/1%). The potential reduction of the x-ray exposure compared to the planning CT scan was estimated. Results: Dose distributions within the irradiated volume were robust against low-pass filtering of the CTs with kernels up to a full-width-at-half-maximum of 4 mm, i.e. the gamma pass rate (1 mm/1%) was ≥98%. The limit of the filter width was 6 mm for brain tumors and 8 mm for targets in the abdomen. These pass rates remained approximately unchanged if a limited amount of noise was added to the CT image sets. The estimated potential reductions of the x-ray exposure were at least a factor of 20. Conclusions: The requirements on image quality in terms of spatial resolution in combination with noise for computing the dose in PT are clearly lower than the image quality of current clinical planning. The results apply, e.g., to ultra-low dose x-ray CTs, proton CTs with coarse spatial detection, and attenuation images from the joint reconstruction of time-of-flight PET scans. 3 zip files provided: Python code for evaluation (retrospective study on patient data, image resolution analysis) CT slices acquired for image resolution analysis CT slices acquired for dependence of noise on x-ray exposure

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-11-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14039122
Primary Topic
Marine and coastal ecosystems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Supporting material: Dose distributions in PT are robust against inferior spatial CT resolution

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Marine and coastal ecosystems
article

Supporting material: Dose distributions in PT are robust against inferior spatial CT resolution

article en

Abstract

Article in Medical Physics Title: Dose distributions in PT are robust against inferior spatial CT resolution Abstract: Background: Treatment planning in radiation therapy is performed on image sets acquired with commercial x-ray computed tomography (CT) scanners. Considering an increased frequency of verification scans for adaptive radiation therapy and the advent of alternatives to x-ray CTs, there is a need to review the requirements for image sets used in radiation therapy planning. Purpose: This study aims to derive the required image quality for the computation of the dose distribution in proton therapy (PT) regarding spatial resolution and the combination of spatial resolution and noise. The knowledge gained is used to explore the potential for dose reduction in tomography-guided PT. Methods: Mathematical considerations indicate that the required spatial resolution for dose computation is on the scale of the set-up margins fed into the robust optimization. This hypothesis was tested by processing retrospectively twelve clinical PT cases, which reflect a variety of tumor localizations. Image sets were low-pass filtered and were made noisy in a generic manner. Dose distributions on the modified CT scans were computed with a Monte-Carlo dose engine. The similarity of these dose distributions with clinical ones was quantified with the gamma-index (1 mm/1%). The potential reduction of the x-ray exposure compared to the planning CT scan was estimated. Results: Dose distributions within the irradiated volume were robust against low-pass filtering of the CTs with kernels up to a full-width-at-half-maximum of 4 mm, i.e. the gamma pass rate (1 mm/1%) was ≥98%. The limit of the filter width was 6 mm for brain tumors and 8 mm for targets in the abdomen. These pass rates remained approximately unchanged if a limited amount of noise was added to the CT image sets. The estimated potential reductions of the x-ray exposure were at least a factor of 20. Conclusions: The requirements on image quality in terms of spatial resolution in combination with noise for computing the dose in PT are clearly lower than the image quality of current clinical planning. The results apply, e.g., to ultra-low dose x-ray CTs, proton CTs with coarse spatial detection, and attenuation images from the joint reconstruction of time-of-flight PET scans. 3 zip files provided: Python code for evaluation (retrospective study on patient data, image resolution analysis) CT slices acquired for image resolution analysis CT slices acquired for dependence of noise on x-ray exposure

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
TU Dortmund University (DE), Essen University Hospital (DE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Marine and coastal ecosystems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.