Informal subgroups in work groups: size and relations in subgroups

The work examines the connection between the size of informal subgroups that arise in production groups and some relationship phenomena (interpersonal and subgroup trust, interpersonal and subgroup identity, interpersonal and subgroup conflict) within these subgroups. It also compares the convexity of the corresponding relationship phenomena in informal dyads and larger subgroups. The data from two empirical studies on different samples of work groups (N=37 and N=42) were used. In these groups, 65 and 71 informal subgroups, respectively, were found. The size of informal subgroups is significantly positively associated with interpersonal trust and interpersonal identity, subgroup trust and subgroup identity, but is not significantly associated with interpersonal and subgroup conflict within subgroups. Interpersonal trust and interpersonal identity, subgroup trust and subgroup identity are weaker within dyads than in larger subgroups. No significant differences in interpersonal conflict within dyads and larger subgroups were found. The article concludes with the discussion that outlines both theoretical and practical implications that the study findings may entail and formulates some important questions for further research.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-02-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14934698
Primary Topic
Team Dynamics and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Informal subgroups in work groups: size and relations in subgroups

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Team Dynamics and Performance
article

Informal subgroups in work groups: size and relations in subgroups

article en

Abstract

The work examines the connection between the size of informal subgroups that arise in production groups and some relationship phenomena (interpersonal and subgroup trust, interpersonal and subgroup identity, interpersonal and subgroup conflict) within these subgroups. It also compares the convexity of the corresponding relationship phenomena in informal dyads and larger subgroups. The data from two empirical studies on different samples of work groups (N=37 and N=42) were used. In these groups, 65 and 71 informal subgroups, respectively, were found. The size of informal subgroups is significantly positively associated with interpersonal trust and interpersonal identity, subgroup trust and subgroup identity, but is not significantly associated with interpersonal and subgroup conflict within subgroups. Interpersonal trust and interpersonal identity, subgroup trust and subgroup identity are weaker within dyads than in larger subgroups. No significant differences in interpersonal conflict within dyads and larger subgroups were found. The article concludes with the discussion that outlines both theoretical and practical implications that the study findings may entail and formulates some important questions for further research.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Southern Federal University (RU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Team Dynamics and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.