Angioplastia ou endarterectomia para estenose de carótida por aterosclerose: uma revisão sistemática

Introduction: Atherosclerotic carotid stenosis is associated with a high risk of stroke, and treatmentaims to prevent complications. Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) aretherapeutic options with different advantages, with CEA being more effective for severe stenosis andCAS serving as a less invasive alternative. Objective: To review the literature on carotid artery stentingand endarterectomy, highlighting indications, complications, and clinical outcomes to define the idealtreatment based on patient profiles. Methodology: A systematic review was conducted, selectingarticles from the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and SciELO databases, published up to 2024,focusing on complication rates and the efficacy of the methods. Results: CEA was more effective inpatients with severe symptomatic stenosis, with a complication rate of 3%, while CAS had a restenosisrate of 15%. For high­risk patients, CAS demonstrated faster recovery but required more frequentreinterventions due to late complications. Conclusion: CEA is preferred for severe and symptomaticstenosis, while CAS is indicated for patients with high surgical risk or complex anatomy.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-11-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14192736
Primary Topic
Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Angioplastia ou endarterectomia para estenose de carótida por aterosclerose: uma revisão sistemática

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
article

Angioplastia ou endarterectomia para estenose de carótida por aterosclerose: uma revisão sistemática

article en

Abstract

Introduction: Atherosclerotic carotid stenosis is associated with a high risk of stroke, and treatmentaims to prevent complications. Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) and carotid artery stenting (CAS) aretherapeutic options with different advantages, with CEA being more effective for severe stenosis andCAS serving as a less invasive alternative. Objective: To review the literature on carotid artery stentingand endarterectomy, highlighting indications, complications, and clinical outcomes to define the idealtreatment based on patient profiles. Methodology: A systematic review was conducted, selectingarticles from the MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science, and SciELO databases, published up to 2024,focusing on complication rates and the efficacy of the methods. Results: CEA was more effective inpatients with severe symptomatic stenosis, with a complication rate of 3%, while CAS had a restenosisrate of 15%. For high­risk patients, CAS demonstrated faster recovery but required more frequentreinterventions due to late complications. Conclusion: CEA is preferred for severe and symptomaticstenosis, while CAS is indicated for patients with high surgical risk or complex anatomy.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Cerebrovascular and Carotid Artery Diseases
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.