Unfair Photonics? How Encoding May Lead to Bias in Photonic Neural Networks

Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems have reached human-level performance in numerous tasks and are now applied across a variety of fields. As these applications evolve and increase in complexity, they create a growing demand for computing solutions that offer both high speed and energy efficiency. In this context, integrated photonic circuits are emerging as a promising alternative to traditional electronic systems, particularly for AI implementations. Photonic Neural Networks (PNNs) have the potential, for instance, to operate at greater speeds and with significantly lower power consumption than their electronic counterparts. PNNs shift computations to the optical domain, using photonic hardware to process data encoded in light. A common circuit design uses meshes of interferometers, which can be configured through their phase shifters to perform matrix-vector multiplications. This enables PNNs to act as complex-valued neural networks, andmultiple real-valued features to be accommodated into a same complex-valued input. Combining features in such way reduces input dimensionality, resulting in more compact and scalable integrated chip designs. However, it can also influence the model’s performance, as the choice of encoding determines the relationships of features. Here, we explore how these fixed relationships can render PNNs more ‘rigid’ and change which features are prioritized during its decision-making process. We analyze different encoding schemes and feature pairings, illustrating how this rigidity may pose challenges in applications where unbiased outcomes are essential, as it can unintentionally amplify or reduce the importance of features.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-03-26
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15090077
Primary Topic
Neural Networks and Reservoir Computing
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unfair Photonics? How Encoding May Lead to Bias in Photonic Neural Networks

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Neural Networks and Reservoir Computing
article

Unfair Photonics? How Encoding May Lead to Bias in Photonic Neural Networks

article en

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) systems have reached human-level performance in numerous tasks and are now applied across a variety of fields. As these applications evolve and increase in complexity, they create a growing demand for computing solutions that offer both high speed and energy efficiency. In this context, integrated photonic circuits are emerging as a promising alternative to traditional electronic systems, particularly for AI implementations. Photonic Neural Networks (PNNs) have the potential, for instance, to operate at greater speeds and with significantly lower power consumption than their electronic counterparts. PNNs shift computations to the optical domain, using photonic hardware to process data encoded in light. A common circuit design uses meshes of interferometers, which can be configured through their phase shifters to perform matrix-vector multiplications. This enables PNNs to act as complex-valued neural networks, andmultiple real-valued features to be accommodated into a same complex-valued input. Combining features in such way reduces input dimensionality, resulting in more compact and scalable integrated chip designs. However, it can also influence the model’s performance, as the choice of encoding determines the relationships of features. Here, we explore how these fixed relationships can render PNNs more ‘rigid’ and change which features are prioritized during its decision-making process. We analyze different encoding schemes and feature pairings, illustrating how this rigidity may pose challenges in applications where unbiased outcomes are essential, as it can unintentionally amplify or reduce the importance of features.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 (FR), École Centrale de Lyon (FR), Institut des Nanotechnologies de Lyon (FR), MIT University (MK), National Council for Scientific Research (LB), Institut de Microélectronique, Electromagnétisme et Photonique (FR), Institut des langues et cultures d'Europe, Amérique, Afrique, Asie et Australie (FR), École d'Ingénieurs en Chimie et Sciences du Numérique (FR), Université Savoie Mont Blanc (FR), RMIT University (AU), Université Grenoble Alpes (FR)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Neural Networks and Reservoir Computing
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.