Agroforestry for carbon farming certification: how to demonstrate co-benefits for biodiversity and ecosystems?

Policy Briefing 66 (v1) describes the clear benefits which agroforestry systems have for biodiversity and the protection of ecosystems. But how can these be demonstrated in carbon farming projects, without a monitoring complexity and timescale which makes the projects uneconomic? Biodiversity was the only one of the six “sustainability” areas recognised in the EU Sustainable Finance Taxonomy which co-legislators of the Carbon Removals and Carbon Farming Certification Framework insisted must show a clear co-benefit. For the other five areas (mitigation, adaptation, water resources, pollution and the circular economy) it is sufficient that projects should “do no significant harm”. Several potential indicators of biodiversity and ecosystem health are suggested for inclusion in the Carbon Farming Delegated Act of the CRCF, due to be published in summer 2025 We also propose a structure for an Agroforestry Carbon Farming Management Plan which sets out the activities and potential monitoring steps to be undertaken in agroforestry carbon farming projects.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University)
Published
2025-02-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14937786
Primary Topic
Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Agroforestry for carbon farming certification: how to demonstrate co-benefits for biodiversity and ecosystems?

Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University)
Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
article

Agroforestry for carbon farming certification: how to demonstrate co-benefits for biodiversity and ecosystems?

article en

Abstract

Policy Briefing 66 (v1) describes the clear benefits which agroforestry systems have for biodiversity and the protection of ecosystems. But how can these be demonstrated in carbon farming projects, without a monitoring complexity and timescale which makes the projects uneconomic? Biodiversity was the only one of the six “sustainability” areas recognised in the EU Sustainable Finance Taxonomy which co-legislators of the Carbon Removals and Carbon Farming Certification Framework insisted must show a clear co-benefit. For the other five areas (mitigation, adaptation, water resources, pollution and the circular economy) it is sufficient that projects should “do no significant harm”. Several potential indicators of biodiversity and ecosystem health are suggested for inclusion in the Carbon Farming Delegated Act of the CRCF, due to be published in summer 2025 We also propose a structure for an Agroforestry Carbon Farming Management Plan which sets out the activities and potential monitoring steps to be undertaken in agroforestry carbon farming projects.

Ghent University Academic Bibliography (Ghent University)
Ghent University Hospital (BE), Hospital Moinhos de Vento (BR), Agroscope (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Agroforestry and silvopastoral systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.