Brachinus (Brachinoaptinus) tianshanicus subsp. aktashiensis Kirschenhofer 1986

B. (Brachinoaptinus) tianshanicus aktashiensis Kirschenhofer, 1986 Material: 1 m: “ Paratypus [red label]”, “ USSR, Uzbekistan / Aktaš (Taškent) / 30.4.1978 / Mir. Dvořák lgt.”, “Brach. (Pseudapt.) / aktashensis / m / det.: Kirschenhofer 1983”, “ex coll M. Dvořák / National Museum / Prague, Czech Republic ” (NMPC); 1 m: “ USSR, Uzbekistan / Aktaš (Taškent) / 28.4.1988 / Mir. Dvořák lgt.”, “ex coll M. Dvořák / National Museum / Prague, Czech Republic ” (NMPC); 1 f: “ USSR, Uzbekistan / Aktaš (Taškent) / 24.4.1980 / Mir. Dvořák lgt.”, “ex coll M. Dvořák / National Museum / Prague, Czech Republic ” (NMPC); 1 ex: Uzbekistan, Karzhantau Mt. R., Aktash 29.IV – 18. V.1993, I. Kabak & A. Molchanov leg. (RSc). Differential diagnosis. This taxon is certainly close to B. tianshanicus Michailov, 1976 in the external structure of the aedeagus (Fig. 9), in the shape of pronotum (Fig. 6) and the metallic coloration of the elytra (Fig. 3). However, it differs from the nominative form in its more massive head and wider elytra, which are usually blue, while in the former they are usually green. For now I am leaving it as a subspecies, but it may turn out to be either a synonym or an independent species. Additional material, genetic analysis and endophallus structure needs to be studied to clarify the status of the taxon. Comments. The type locality of B. (Brachinoaptinus) aktashiensis Kirschenhofer, 1986 remained unclear due to ambiguous label data of type material (Uzbekistan, Tashkent-Aktash, 1500m), since there are several toponyms with this name in Uzbekistan. Most likely, judging by the accessibility and the indicated height, specimens were collected near Mount Aktash (2400 m, 41.248382, 69.866052), situated 40 km east of Tashkent, not the well known Mount Aktash (3462 m, 41.722222, 70.475556). The material attributed to this taxon in the paper by Belousov & Kabak (1992) should be re-checked, as the sites are widely separated on different mountain ranges, and no one is from the type locality. Distribution. Western part of the Chatkal Mountain range.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-12-31
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14657633
Primary Topic
Bryophyte Studies and Records
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Brachinus (Brachinoaptinus) tianshanicus subsp. aktashiensis Kirschenhofer 1986

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Bryophyte Studies and Records
article

Brachinus (Brachinoaptinus) tianshanicus subsp. aktashiensis Kirschenhofer 1986

article en

Abstract

B. (Brachinoaptinus) tianshanicus aktashiensis Kirschenhofer, 1986 Material: 1 m: “ Paratypus [red label]”, “ USSR, Uzbekistan / Aktaš (Taškent) / 30.4.1978 / Mir. Dvořák lgt.”, “Brach. (Pseudapt.) / aktashensis / m / det.: Kirschenhofer 1983”, “ex coll M. Dvořák / National Museum / Prague, Czech Republic ” (NMPC); 1 m: “ USSR, Uzbekistan / Aktaš (Taškent) / 28.4.1988 / Mir. Dvořák lgt.”, “ex coll M. Dvořák / National Museum / Prague, Czech Republic ” (NMPC); 1 f: “ USSR, Uzbekistan / Aktaš (Taškent) / 24.4.1980 / Mir. Dvořák lgt.”, “ex coll M. Dvořák / National Museum / Prague, Czech Republic ” (NMPC); 1 ex: Uzbekistan, Karzhantau Mt. R., Aktash 29.IV – 18. V.1993, I. Kabak & A. Molchanov leg. (RSc). Differential diagnosis. This taxon is certainly close to B. tianshanicus Michailov, 1976 in the external structure of the aedeagus (Fig. 9), in the shape of pronotum (Fig. 6) and the metallic coloration of the elytra (Fig. 3). However, it differs from the nominative form in its more massive head and wider elytra, which are usually blue, while in the former they are usually green. For now I am leaving it as a subspecies, but it may turn out to be either a synonym or an independent species. Additional material, genetic analysis and endophallus structure needs to be studied to clarify the status of the taxon. Comments. The type locality of B. (Brachinoaptinus) aktashiensis Kirschenhofer, 1986 remained unclear due to ambiguous label data of type material (Uzbekistan, Tashkent-Aktash, 1500m), since there are several toponyms with this name in Uzbekistan. Most likely, judging by the accessibility and the indicated height, specimens were collected near Mount Aktash (2400 m, 41.248382, 69.866052), situated 40 km east of Tashkent, not the well known Mount Aktash (3462 m, 41.722222, 70.475556). The material attributed to this taxon in the paper by Belousov & Kabak (1992) should be re-checked, as the sites are widely separated on different mountain ranges, and no one is from the type locality. Distribution. Western part of the Chatkal Mountain range.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Bryophyte Studies and Records
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.