Embidobia Ashmead 1896, sp. nov.

Key to the females of Oriental species of Embidobia Ashmead, 1896 1. Vertex, mesosoma and metasoma smooth (Figs 6A, 16A) ............................................................... 2 – Vertex, mesosoma and metasoma either entirely or partially sculptured (e.g., Figs 1A, 3A, 5A, 7A) ........................................................................................................................................................... 3 2. Facial and malar striae prominent (Fig. 6D); ocelli present; posterior mesoscutellar sulcus foveate; metascutellum protruding posteriorly (Fig. 6A); mesopleural carina entire (Fig. 6C); cilia on postmarginalis short, at most 0.2 × width of fore wing (Fig. 2E); T1 shorter than T2; T2 longer than T3 (Fig. 6A); entire habitus yellow-brown (Fig. 6B) ................ E. gauriputra Veenakumari sp. nov. – Facial striae weak and malar striae absent (Fig. 16D); ocelli absent; posterior mesoscutellar sulcus not foveate; metascutellum posteriorly evenly rounded (Fig. 16A); mesopleural carina abbreviated (Fig. 16C); cilia on postmarginalis elongate, more than half the width of fore wing (Fig. 12E); T1 and T2 subequal in length; T2 shorter than T3 (Fig. 16A); head and mesosoma brown-black, metasoma yellow-brown (Fig. 16B) ............................................... E. saroma Veenakumari sp. nov. 3. Metascutellum not visible when viewed dorsally, concealed beneath mesoscutellum; lateral propodeal area entirely smooth with foveae on posterior margin; metasomal depression predominantly smooth (Figs 8A, 11A, 13A) ......................................................................................................................... 4 – Metascutellum visible when viewed dorsally; lateral propodeal area longitudinal costate; metasomal depression costate (e.g., Figs 1A, 3A, 5A, 7A) ................................................................................ 6 4. T2 1.2 × longer than T3; T1 entirely longitudinally striate; T2 and T3 strongly coriaceous reticulate (Fig. 13C); mesoscutellum entirely rugose (Fig. 13A); foveae of mesepimeral sulcus wide and transverse (Fig. 13D) .................................................................................. E. orientalis Dodd, 1939 – T2 and T3 equal in length; T1 longitudinally striate with a smooth posterior margin; T2 and T3 with fine weak reticulations; mesoscutellum medially smooth and laterally rugose (Figs 8A, 11A); foveae of mesepimeral sulcus not transverse except basally (Figs 8C, 11C) ............................................... 5 5. Metasoma elongate, at least 1.5× as long as wide; mesoscutellum reaching posterior margin of metascutellum (Fig. 11A); interantennal process in posterior half wide (Fig. 11D) .......................... ......................................................................................................... E. omkara Veenakumari sp. nov. – Metasoma short, subequal in length and width; mesoscutellum extending beyond posterior margin of metascutellum (Fig. 8A); interantennal process in posterior half narrow (Fig. 8D) ...................... .......................................................................................................... E. hrdaya Veenakumari sp. nov. 6. T2 and T3 either equal in length or T3 longer than T2 (Figs 7A, 17B) ............................................ 7 – T2 longer than T3 (e.g., Figs 1A, 3A, 5A, 9A) ................................................................................. 8 7. T3 at least 1.2 × as long as T2; mesoscutellum medially smooth, laterally rugose; metascutellum posteromedially protruding; metascutellum anteriorly foveate and posteriorly with short longitudinal carinae; medial longitudinal costae on T1 short, extending at most 0.4 × the length of tergite; T3 smooth with a transverse band of areolate sculpture medially (Fig. 7A) ........................................... ......................................................................................................... E. hiranya Veenakumari sp. nov. – T2 and T3 subequal in length; mesoscutellum entirely smooth; metascutellum posteromedially evenly rounded; metascutellum anteriorly foveate and posteriorly with depressions; medial longitudinal costae on T1 elongate, extending at least 0.8× the length of tergite; T3 anteriorly reticulate and posteriorly smooth (Fig. 17A) ........................................................ E. yuyutsu Veenakumari sp. nov. 8. T1 smooth, with longitudinal costae sublaterally; T2 predominantly smooth with weak impressions of reticulations posterad; basal foveae on T2 minute (Fig. 1A) ..... E. agastya Veenakumari sp. nov. – T1 longitudinally costate; T2 longitudinally costate; basal foveae on T2 large and distinct (e.g., Figs 5A, 9A, 10A, 14A) .................................................................................................................... 9 9. OOL either longer or equal to median ocellar diameter (Figs 4A, 5A) .......................................... 10 – OOL shorter than the median ocellar diameter (Figs 3A, 9A, 10A, 14A, 15A) ..............................11 10. T1 striate at basal half; T2 longitudinally striate at base; OOL subequal to median ocellar diameter (Fig. 4A) .................................................................................................. E. brittanica Girault, 1917 – T1 striate 0.9 × the length of the tergite; T2 striate, striae extending 0.8× length of tergite; OOL at least 1.3× median ocellar diameter (Fig. 5A) ........................... E. dooranetra Veenakumari sp. nov. 11. Mesoscutellum entirely smooth (Figs 9A, 15A) ............................................................................. 12 – Mesoscutellum either partially or entirely rugose or rugose-imbricate (Figs 3A, 10A, 14A) ........ 13 12. Metasoma ovate, at most 1.2 × as long as wide; metascutellum longitudinally costate with foveae between costae; lateral propodeal area anteriorly smooth and posteriorly longitudinally costate (Fig. 9A); upper frons with several semicircular carinae (Fig. 9D); submarginalis of fore wing not broken in front of marginalis (Fig. 2G) ............................................ E. jatayu Veenakumari sp. nov. – Metasoma spindle shaped>1.5× as long as wide; metascutellum anteriorly foveate and posteriorly with depressions; lateral propodeal area entirely longitudinally costate (Fig. 15A); upper frons with several short arched carinae (Fig. 15D); submarginalis of fore wing broken in front of marginalis (Fig. 12D) ..................................................................................... E. sankirna Veenakumari sp. nov. 13. Mesoscutum with well defined rugae; T1 longitudinally costate almost the entire length of tergite (Fig. 10A); upper frons with several short raised carinae arranged semicircular fashion (Fig. 10D); speculum of mesopleuron densely transversely carinate, carinae extending up to mesopleural pit (Fig. 10C) ..................................................................................... E. mahabali Veenakumari sp. nov. – Mesoscutum with imbricate sculpture; T1 longitudinally costate with a wide smooth patch posteriorly (Figs 3A, 14A); upper frons either with long or short oblique carinae (Figs 3D, 14D); speculum of mesopleuron sparsely transversely carinate, carinae terminating way above mesopleural pit (Figs 3C, 14C) ................................................................................................................................................ 14 14. Interantennal process elongate and narrow (Fig. 14D); mesoscutellum with impressions of weak rugae; posterior propodeal projections short and blunt; posterior margin of metascutellum weakly rounded (Fig. 14A); upper frons with short uneven transverse and oblique carinae (Fig. 14D) ........ ......................................................................................................... E. procera Veenakumari sp. nov. – Interantennal process short and wide (Fig. 3D); mesoscutellum with imbricate sculpture; posterior propodeal projections elongate and sharp; posterior margin of metascutellum projecting (Fig. 3A); carinae on upper frons continuous and elongate (Fig. 3D) ......... E. barbarika Veenakumari sp. nov.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-11-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14370294
Primary Topic
Subterranean biodiversity and taxonomy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Embidobia Ashmead 1896, sp. nov.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Subterranean biodiversity and taxonomy
article

Embidobia Ashmead 1896, sp. nov.

article en

Abstract

Key to the females of Oriental species of Embidobia Ashmead, 1896 1. Vertex, mesosoma and metasoma smooth (Figs 6A, 16A) ............................................................... 2 – Vertex, mesosoma and metasoma either entirely or partially sculptured (e.g., Figs 1A, 3A, 5A, 7A) ........................................................................................................................................................... 3 2. Facial and malar striae prominent (Fig. 6D); ocelli present; posterior mesoscutellar sulcus foveate; metascutellum protruding posteriorly (Fig. 6A); mesopleural carina entire (Fig. 6C); cilia on postmarginalis short, at most 0.2 × width of fore wing (Fig. 2E); T1 shorter than T2; T2 longer than T3 (Fig. 6A); entire habitus yellow-brown (Fig. 6B) ................ E. gauriputra Veenakumari sp. nov. – Facial striae weak and malar striae absent (Fig. 16D); ocelli absent; posterior mesoscutellar sulcus not foveate; metascutellum posteriorly evenly rounded (Fig. 16A); mesopleural carina abbreviated (Fig. 16C); cilia on postmarginalis elongate, more than half the width of fore wing (Fig. 12E); T1 and T2 subequal in length; T2 shorter than T3 (Fig. 16A); head and mesosoma brown-black, metasoma yellow-brown (Fig. 16B) ............................................... E. saroma Veenakumari sp. nov. 3. Metascutellum not visible when viewed dorsally, concealed beneath mesoscutellum; lateral propodeal area entirely smooth with foveae on posterior margin; metasomal depression predominantly smooth (Figs 8A, 11A, 13A) ......................................................................................................................... 4 – Metascutellum visible when viewed dorsally; lateral propodeal area longitudinal costate; metasomal depression costate (e.g., Figs 1A, 3A, 5A, 7A) ................................................................................ 6 4. T2 1.2 × longer than T3; T1 entirely longitudinally striate; T2 and T3 strongly coriaceous reticulate (Fig. 13C); mesoscutellum entirely rugose (Fig. 13A); foveae of mesepimeral sulcus wide and transverse (Fig. 13D) .................................................................................. E. orientalis Dodd, 1939 – T2 and T3 equal in length; T1 longitudinally striate with a smooth posterior margin; T2 and T3 with fine weak reticulations; mesoscutellum medially smooth and laterally rugose (Figs 8A, 11A); foveae of mesepimeral sulcus not transverse except basally (Figs 8C, 11C) ............................................... 5 5. Metasoma elongate, at least 1.5× as long as wide; mesoscutellum reaching posterior margin of metascutellum (Fig. 11A); interantennal process in posterior half wide (Fig. 11D) .......................... ......................................................................................................... E. omkara Veenakumari sp. nov. – Metasoma short, subequal in length and width; mesoscutellum extending beyond posterior margin of metascutellum (Fig. 8A); interantennal process in posterior half narrow (Fig. 8D) ...................... .......................................................................................................... E. hrdaya Veenakumari sp. nov. 6. T2 and T3 either equal in length or T3 longer than T2 (Figs 7A, 17B) ............................................ 7 – T2 longer than T3 (e.g., Figs 1A, 3A, 5A, 9A) ................................................................................. 8 7. T3 at least 1.2 × as long as T2; mesoscutellum medially smooth, laterally rugose; metascutellum posteromedially protruding; metascutellum anteriorly foveate and posteriorly with short longitudinal carinae; medial longitudinal costae on T1 short, extending at most 0.4 × the length of tergite; T3 smooth with a transverse band of areolate sculpture medially (Fig. 7A) ........................................... ......................................................................................................... E. hiranya Veenakumari sp. nov. – T2 and T3 subequal in length; mesoscutellum entirely smooth; metascutellum posteromedially evenly rounded; metascutellum anteriorly foveate and posteriorly with depressions; medial longitudinal costae on T1 elongate, extending at least 0.8× the length of tergite; T3 anteriorly reticulate and posteriorly smooth (Fig. 17A) ........................................................ E. yuyutsu Veenakumari sp. nov. 8. T1 smooth, with longitudinal costae sublaterally; T2 predominantly smooth with weak impressions of reticulations posterad; basal foveae on T2 minute (Fig. 1A) ..... E. agastya Veenakumari sp. nov. – T1 longitudinally costate; T2 longitudinally costate; basal foveae on T2 large and distinct (e.g., Figs 5A, 9A, 10A, 14A) .................................................................................................................... 9 9. OOL either longer or equal to median ocellar diameter (Figs 4A, 5A) .......................................... 10 – OOL shorter than the median ocellar diameter (Figs 3A, 9A, 10A, 14A, 15A) ..............................11 10. T1 striate at basal half; T2 longitudinally striate at base; OOL subequal to median ocellar diameter (Fig. 4A) .................................................................................................. E. brittanica Girault, 1917 – T1 striate 0.9 × the length of the tergite; T2 striate, striae extending 0.8× length of tergite; OOL at least 1.3× median ocellar diameter (Fig. 5A) ........................... E. dooranetra Veenakumari sp. nov. 11. Mesoscutellum entirely smooth (Figs 9A, 15A) ............................................................................. 12 – Mesoscutellum either partially or entirely rugose or rugose-imbricate (Figs 3A, 10A, 14A) ........ 13 12. Metasoma ovate, at most 1.2 × as long as wide; metascutellum longitudinally costate with foveae between costae; lateral propodeal area anteriorly smooth and posteriorly longitudinally costate (Fig. 9A); upper frons with several semicircular carinae (Fig. 9D); submarginalis of fore wing not broken in front of marginalis (Fig. 2G) ............................................ E. jatayu Veenakumari sp. nov. – Metasoma spindle shaped>1.5× as long as wide; metascutellum anteriorly foveate and posteriorly with depressions; lateral propodeal area entirely longitudinally costate (Fig. 15A); upper frons with several short arched carinae (Fig. 15D); submarginalis of fore wing broken in front of marginalis (Fig. 12D) ..................................................................................... E. sankirna Veenakumari sp. nov. 13. Mesoscutum with well defined rugae; T1 longitudinally costate almost the entire length of tergite (Fig. 10A); upper frons with several short raised carinae arranged semicircular fashion (Fig. 10D); speculum of mesopleuron densely transversely carinate, carinae extending up to mesopleural pit (Fig. 10C) ..................................................................................... E. mahabali Veenakumari sp. nov. – Mesoscutum with imbricate sculpture; T1 longitudinally costate with a wide smooth patch posteriorly (Figs 3A, 14A); upper frons either with long or short oblique carinae (Figs 3D, 14D); speculum of mesopleuron sparsely transversely carinate, carinae terminating way above mesopleural pit (Figs 3C, 14C) ................................................................................................................................................ 14 14. Interantennal process elongate and narrow (Fig. 14D); mesoscutellum with impressions of weak rugae; posterior propodeal projections short and blunt; posterior margin of metascutellum weakly rounded (Fig. 14A); upper frons with short uneven transverse and oblique carinae (Fig. 14D) ........ ......................................................................................................... E. procera Veenakumari sp. nov. – Interantennal process short and wide (Fig. 3D); mesoscutellum with imbricate sculpture; posterior propodeal projections elongate and sharp; posterior margin of metascutellum projecting (Fig. 3A); carinae on upper frons continuous and elongate (Fig. 3D) ......... E. barbarika Veenakumari sp. nov.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Indian Institute of Horticultural Research (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Subterranean biodiversity and taxonomy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.