Sanctions: Strike as a War, Perceived as an Economic Crisis

ABSTRACT: This research note provides preliminary results, observations, and insights from an ongoing project investigating the impact of sanctions, particularly following the 2018 U.S. withdrawal from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), on Iranian public opinion. The project aims to explore why these sanctions did not trigger a "rally around the flag" effect, commonly seen in times of foreign intervention or conflict. Instead, the sanctions revealed deep internal divisions and widespread dissatisfaction with the Iranian government's mismanagement of the economic crisis. The central hypothesis of this research is that sanctions exhibit a dual nature. On the one hand, sanctions act as a form of foreign intervention that could potentially lead to the unifying "rally around the flag" effect. On the other hand, they function as an economic crisis, which amplifies public frustration and dissatisfaction with the sitting government. This research emphasizes the importance of understanding Iranian public opinion and behavior, in order to determine whether sanctions were perceived primarily as an act of war or as an economic catastrophe. KEYWORDS: sanction, nationalism, public opinion, JCOPA

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-12-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14514819
Primary Topic
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sanctions: Strike as a War, Perceived as an Economic Crisis

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
article

Sanctions: Strike as a War, Perceived as an Economic Crisis

article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT: This research note provides preliminary results, observations, and insights from an ongoing project investigating the impact of sanctions, particularly following the 2018 U.S. withdrawal from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), on Iranian public opinion. The project aims to explore why these sanctions did not trigger a "rally around the flag" effect, commonly seen in times of foreign intervention or conflict. Instead, the sanctions revealed deep internal divisions and widespread dissatisfaction with the Iranian government's mismanagement of the economic crisis. The central hypothesis of this research is that sanctions exhibit a dual nature. On the one hand, sanctions act as a form of foreign intervention that could potentially lead to the unifying "rally around the flag" effect. On the other hand, they function as an economic crisis, which amplifies public frustration and dissatisfaction with the sitting government. This research emphasizes the importance of understanding Iranian public opinion and behavior, in order to determine whether sanctions were perceived primarily as an act of war or as an economic catastrophe. KEYWORDS: sanction, nationalism, public opinion, JCOPA

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Economic Sanctions and International Relations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Sanctions: Strike as a War, Perceived as an Economic Crisis · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS