NON-EQUIVALENT VOCABULARY AS A SUBJECT OF LINGUACULTURAL ANALYSIS

The article is devoted to the linguacultural analysis of non-equivalent vocabulary as a linguacultural unit. The work examines the concept of non-equivalent vocabulary from various points of view, analyzes the diversity of definitions of this concept. The authors believe that there is no definition of non-equivalent vocabulary that would satisfy all researchers. Therefore, there is no clarity in the classification of this extensive and complex group of words, its boundaries are not clearly defined. The work adopts the classification of E.M. Vereshchagin and V.G. Kostomarov, according to which non-equivalent vocabulary includes designations of phenomena specific to a given culture, which are a product of the cumulative (accumulative) function of language and can be considered as repositories of background knowledge. In the practical part, a linguacultural analysis of non-equivalent vocabulary is carried out based on the semiotic model of C. Morris. According to this model, the consideration of non-equivalent vocabulary as a linguacultural unit is possible from the position of semiotics within the framework of four aspects of study that affect almost all levels of language: syntactics and sigmatics, semantics and pragmatics.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2025-04-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15294163
Primary Topic
Language, Communication, and Linguistic Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

NON-EQUIVALENT VOCABULARY AS A SUBJECT OF LINGUACULTURAL ANALYSIS

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Language, Communication, and Linguistic Studies
article

NON-EQUIVALENT VOCABULARY AS A SUBJECT OF LINGUACULTURAL ANALYSIS

article en

Abstract

The article is devoted to the linguacultural analysis of non-equivalent vocabulary as a linguacultural unit. The work examines the concept of non-equivalent vocabulary from various points of view, analyzes the diversity of definitions of this concept. The authors believe that there is no definition of non-equivalent vocabulary that would satisfy all researchers. Therefore, there is no clarity in the classification of this extensive and complex group of words, its boundaries are not clearly defined. The work adopts the classification of E.M. Vereshchagin and V.G. Kostomarov, according to which non-equivalent vocabulary includes designations of phenomena specific to a given culture, which are a product of the cumulative (accumulative) function of language and can be considered as repositories of background knowledge. In the practical part, a linguacultural analysis of non-equivalent vocabulary is carried out based on the semiotic model of C. Morris. According to this model, the consideration of non-equivalent vocabulary as a linguacultural unit is possible from the position of semiotics within the framework of four aspects of study that affect almost all levels of language: syntactics and sigmatics, semantics and pragmatics.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Language, Communication, and Linguistic Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.