An Analysis Comparing Fistulotomy and Fistulectomy in the Treatment of Simple Anal Fistulas

Background: Fistulotomy and fistulectomy are common surgical procedures for treating simple anal fistulas, a condition involving abnormal connections between the anal canal and skin. This study aims to compare these two methods, focusing on key outcomes such as healing time, recurrence rates, and postoperative complications, including incontinence, to determine the most effective treatment. Methods: A simple fistula was defined as one having a single external and internal opening along with a palpable tract. Group I consisted of 25 patients who underwent fistulotomy with marsupialization, while Group II comprised 25 patients who received the fistulectomy procedure for their low-lying anal fistula. The patients were matched based on age, sex, and other physical factors. Results: The mean duration of surgery was 29.5 minutes for fistulotomy and 32.2 minutes for fistulectomy, with no statistically significant difference (p-value = 0.891). The duration of wound healing was significantly longer in the fistulectomy group (21 ± 5.5 days) compared to the fistulotomy group (12 ± 2.5 days) (p-value = 0.004). Postoperative pain, as assessed by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), was comparable between the two groups, with a mean VAS score of 3.8 ± 1.51 in the fistulotomy group and 3.5 ± 2.19 in the fistulectomy group (p-value = 0.217). The incidence of anal incontinence was 10% (4 cases) in the fistulotomy group and 2.5% (1 case) in the fistulectomy group, although the difference was not statistically significant (p-value = 0.191). The recurrence rate was low and similar in both groups, with 1 case (2.5%) in each group. Conclusion: Fistulotomy demonstrated shorter operative time and wound healing compared to fistulectomy in the management of simple anal fistulas. However, it was associated with a higher incidence of anal incontinence, although not statistically significant. Both procedures exhibited low recurrence rates. The choice between fistulotomy and fistulectomy should be individualized based on patient factors and fistula characteristics.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-08-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13827834
Primary Topic
Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Analysis Comparing Fistulotomy and Fistulectomy in the Treatment of Simple Anal Fistulas

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes
article

An Analysis Comparing Fistulotomy and Fistulectomy in the Treatment of Simple Anal Fistulas

article en

Abstract

Background: Fistulotomy and fistulectomy are common surgical procedures for treating simple anal fistulas, a condition involving abnormal connections between the anal canal and skin. This study aims to compare these two methods, focusing on key outcomes such as healing time, recurrence rates, and postoperative complications, including incontinence, to determine the most effective treatment. Methods: A simple fistula was defined as one having a single external and internal opening along with a palpable tract. Group I consisted of 25 patients who underwent fistulotomy with marsupialization, while Group II comprised 25 patients who received the fistulectomy procedure for their low-lying anal fistula. The patients were matched based on age, sex, and other physical factors. Results: The mean duration of surgery was 29.5 minutes for fistulotomy and 32.2 minutes for fistulectomy, with no statistically significant difference (p-value = 0.891). The duration of wound healing was significantly longer in the fistulectomy group (21 ± 5.5 days) compared to the fistulotomy group (12 ± 2.5 days) (p-value = 0.004). Postoperative pain, as assessed by the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), was comparable between the two groups, with a mean VAS score of 3.8 ± 1.51 in the fistulotomy group and 3.5 ± 2.19 in the fistulectomy group (p-value = 0.217). The incidence of anal incontinence was 10% (4 cases) in the fistulotomy group and 2.5% (1 case) in the fistulectomy group, although the difference was not statistically significant (p-value = 0.191). The recurrence rate was low and similar in both groups, with 1 case (2.5%) in each group. Conclusion: Fistulotomy demonstrated shorter operative time and wound healing compared to fistulectomy in the management of simple anal fistulas. However, it was associated with a higher incidence of anal incontinence, although not statistically significant. Both procedures exhibited low recurrence rates. The choice between fistulotomy and fistulectomy should be individualized based on patient factors and fistula characteristics.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Institute of Medical Sciences (IN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Anorectal Disease Treatments and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.