Ibotyporanga Mello-Leitao 1944
Genus Ibotyporanga Mello-Leitão, 1944 Ibotyporanga Mello-Leitão, 1944: 6. Type species: I. naideae Mello-Leitão, 1944. Ibotyporanga – Huber 2000: 94. — Huber & Brescovit 2003: 17. — Huber & Villarreal 2020: 62. Diagnosis Small short-legged pholcids with eight eyes and globular abdomen (Figs 25, 55, 73), similar in size and body shape to other New World Ninetinae in the genera Pholcophora, Papiamenta Huber, 2000, and Gertschiola Brignoli, 1981. Males are easily distinguished from these and from all other pholcids by single median process on chelicerae (e.g., Figs 29, 34, 40). Corresponding pockets on female epigyna (e.g., Figs 30, 35, 41) are diagnostic for females, but less unique among Pholcidae (similar median pockets occur in other subfamilies, e.g., in Mesabolivar). Males further distinguished by unique light prolateral band of unknown function on procursus (e.g., Figs 28, 33, 37). Description Male MEASUREMENTS. Total body length 1.5–2.7; carapace width 0.6–1.0. PME diameter 50–100 µm; AME diameter 30–80 µm. Leg 1 length 2.8–7.4; tibia 1 length 0.7–2.0; tibia 4 in most species longer than tibia 1, only in the relatively long-legged I. xique sp. nov. and I. xakriaba sp. nov., as well as in I. itatim sp. nov., shorter (tibia 4 / tibia 1 length: 0.94-0.98); leg femora diameters 0.13–0.22; leg tibiae diameters 0.09–0.12. Tibia 1 L/d in most species 8–15, only in the long-legged I. xique and I. xakriaba higher: 20 and 18, respectively. COLOUR. In ethanol mostly ochre-yellow to light brown, carapace medially and ocular area often darker, legs usually with darker rings on femora (subdistally) and tibiae (proximally and subdistally); abdomen pale gray, usually with darker internal marks dorsally and laterally; ventrally with light ochre to brown plates in front of gonopore and in front of spinnerets. Live specimens often with slightly reddish or orange prosoma and legs. BODY. Habitus as in Figs 25, 55, and 73. Ocular area slightly raised. Carapace with distinct but shallow thoracic groove (Figs 2–3). Clypeus with sclerotized rim with median notch (Fig. 107A). Sternum slightly wider than long, sometimes with pair of low and indistinct anterior processes near coxae 1 (Fig. 3G); processes without pores. Abdomen globular. Numerous rimmed pores (Fig. 18) at regular intervals on many body parts, especially on legs, but also on chelicerae and abdomen; outer diameter 2.2–4.2 µm; opening diameter: 0.35–0.45 µm. Gonopore with four epiandrous spigots in variable pattern (evenly spaced or in two pairs; Figs 4–5). Spinnerets general arrangement as usual in Pholcidae (Fig. 6); ALS with only two spigots (Figs 7–8): one strongly widened spigot and one long and slender spigot; PMS with two short conical spigots (Figs 6–8); PLS without spigots; AMS area with one or two median hairs and slightly modified sculptured area (Fig. 7A–B). CHELICERAE. With distinctive median frontal apophysis, usually in proximal position (e.g., Figs 34, 40), only in I. ziruma sp. nov. in distal position (Fig. 29); chelicerae width 0.25–0.40. Stridulatory files (Figs 9–10) very fine and poorly visible in dissecting microscope, with ~45–65 ridges, distances between ridges (in eight species studied with SEM) 1.7–3.1 µm, distances proximally in some species smaller than distally (e.g., I. guanambi sp. nov., I. sertao sp. nov.), in other species proximally larger than distally (e.g., I. naideae Mello-Leitão; I. itatim sp. nov.). PALPS. Coxa unmodified; trochanter with indistinct ventral protrusion; femur variably long, proximally with retrolateral process sometimes directed towards distal, with prolateral stridulatory pick (modified hair; Fig. 12F), femur distally widened but unmodified; femur-patella joints usually not (or very slightly) shifted toward prolateral side; patella ranging from very short (e.g., Fig. 47) to very long (e.g., Fig. 109); tibia with two trichobothria; tibia-tarsus joints usually slightly shifted toward retrolateral side; palpal tarsal organ capsulate with small opening (Fig. 13), outer diameter 6–10 µm, opening diameter 1.3– 2.5 µm; procursus shape highly variable, from short and wide (e.g., Figs 28, 33, 39) to very long and slender (e.g., Figs 62, 85, 102), always with light prolateral band of unknown function (Figs 28, 33, 37); distally often with tiny side branch (Fig. 12A–C), tip often semi-transparent (Figs 57, 76, 114); in some species with variably long dorsal side branch (e.g., Figs 81, 89, 98); genital bulb with proximal sclerite connecting to tarsus, strongly attached to tendon of muscle from tibia (sclerite thus usually breaks when detaching bulb from palp; therefore often not drawn); bulbous part of genital bulb in most species with distinct prolateral sclerite (e.g., Figs 28, 33, 37), in several species with small ventral tubercles (prominent in I. naideae, Fig. 11E–F); bulbal process with variably complex tip consisting of sclerotized and membranous elements and presumably carrying sperm duct opening. LEGS. Without spines but with stronger hairs ventrally on all femora (Fig. 15A–B; stronger compared to neighboring leg hairs: diameter ~5 µm versus ~3 µm in neighboring hairs, but similar hairs occur on leg coxae, sternum, palps, carapace, and abdomen). Without curved hairs. Tibia 1 or tibia 1+ tibia 2 with sexually dimorphic short vertical hairs (Fig. 16), in several rows or bands, base diameter 4.1–6.3 µm, length 17–34 µm (usually 17–25 µm), diameter proximally 1.6–2.1 µm, at half-length 0.9–1.0 µm. Distal leg segments (tarsi and metatarsi, also tibiae) with putative chemoreceptors (Fig. 17), in light microscope similar to sexually dimorphic short vertical hairs but with distal side branches, with regular oblique furrows, and flattened (i.e., with oval diameter); base diameter ~4.5–7.5 µm, length 20–40 µm, diameter proximally 1.7–2.8 µm, at half-length with oval cross section, ~1.5×2.5 µm. Femora, tibiae, metatarsi, and tarsi with round or oval cuticular plates (Fig. 18) at regular intervals, diameter ~4.5–7.5 µm. Base of trichobothria round but with distal bulge and usually with pair of variably distinct lateral humps (Fig. 15); outer diameter of base: 11–18 µm; proximal diameter of seta: 1.3–2.1 µm; retrolateral trichobothrium on tibia 1 at 51–66% of tibia length; prolateral trichobothrium absent on tibia 1. Without slender metatarsal hairs (as described in Huber et al. 2023c, 2024c). Tarsi with 3–4 distinct pseudosegments distally (cf. Fig. 21C), proximally not pseudosegmented. Leg tarsal organs capsulate with small opening (Fig. 19), outer diameter 3.9–7.4 µm, opening diameter 1.0–1.5 µm. Tarsi 4 with two comb hairs distally on prolateral side (Fig. 20D–F). Tarsal claws as usual for family (Figs 20–21); main claws with 7–10 teeth; teeth on tarsus 4 slightly different (shorter and directed more towards distal). Female In general, similar to males; often larger; coloration often slightly darker; legs in some species longer than in males (especially in short-legged species; Fig. S4), in other species shorter (especially in long-legged species); without sexually dimorphic short vertical hairs on tibiae. Sternum and clypeus unmodified. Chelicerae without stridulatory files (Fig. 9). Palpal tarsal organ as in males (Fig. 14), usually oval rather than round, opening diameter 1.4–1.9 µm. Other sensory organs and comb hairs on tarsi 4 as in males. Spinnerets as in males (Figs 6–8). Tip of palp with simple pointed process and subterminal invagination (Fig. 14). Epigynum anterior plate trapezoidal to semicircular, with variably distinct pocket or ridge usually in anterior position (e.g., Figs 35, 41), only in I. diroa in central position (Fig. 72) and in I. ziruma sp. nov. in posterior position (Fig. 30). Posterior epigynal plate relatively large but simple, unmodified. Internal genitalia with distinct pore plates on posterior, weakly sclerotized arc (e.g., Figs 29, 36, 41), sometimes with distinct median sclerite (e.g., Figs 100, 104, 108), sometimes with membranous lateral pouches or tubes (e.g., Figs 46, 63, 77, 86), and sometimes with large and complex expandable median sac (e.g., Figs 100, 108, 112, 124, 128; cf. Appendix 3, character 24). Relationships The latest molecular phylogeny of Pholcidae (Eberle et al. 2018; Huber et al. 2018) resolved Ibotyporanga as sister to a North and Central American clade including the genera Pholcophora and Papiamenta. This sister group relationship received low support, but it is strongly supported by unpublished UCE data including more representatives of the mentioned genera, and many more representatives of other Ninetinae genera (G. Meng, L. Podsiadlowski, B.A. Huber, unpubl. data). The monophyly of Ibotyporanga is well supported by several morphological synapomorphies (Fig. 1): median notch on male clypeus (char. 1); reduction of ALS spigots to only two (char. 2); single median apophysis on male chelicerae (char. 3); distinct light band on procursus (char. 10); and median pocket on female epigynal plate (char. 18). In addition, the prolateral sclerite on the bulbous part of the genital bulb (char. 13) might be a further synapomorphy (see Discussion). Internal relationships appear reasonably well resolved in the morphological cladogram (Fig. 1) but ten of the 15 nodes in this tree are supported by a single character each, and very few groups receive additional support from CO1 sequences (cf. Fig. S2). The cladistic analysis suggests that species with a ‘regular’ procursus (i.e., not slender and elongated; char. 6) are plesiomorphic, while those with a slender elongated procursus are derived and monophyletic. Within this clade, species with a ‘split’ procursus, i.e., with a distinct dorsal branch in addition to the main branch (char. 8), are again resolved as a monophylum. Natural history Ibotyporanga spiders are typically found in dry habitats, dominated by low and thorny vegetation (Figs 22–23). Some species were found on bare rock outcrops, under rocks lying in the plain sun, while o
Institutions
- Charles University (CZ)
- Universidade Federal do Piauí (BR)
- Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig (DE)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
- Published
- 2024-10-18
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14013600
- Primary Topic
- Subterranean biodiversity and taxonomy
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00