Retrospective Analysis of Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic Versus Open Stabilization for Recurrent Shoulder Dislocation

Background: Recurrent shoulder dislocations impair quality of life and function. Stabilising and preventing dislocations often require surgery. Surgery is often needed to stabilise and prevent dislocations. Their effectiveness in preventing recurrence and improving postoperative outcomes is currently being studied, underlining the need for rigorous evaluation to support evidence-based patient management decisions. Methods: A retrospective study at MGM Medical College and LSK Hospital, Kishanganj, included 50 arthroscopic or surgically stabilised recurrent shoulder dislocation patients. Electronic medical data included demographics, surgeries, and post-operation findings. Results: This retrospective study examined 50 recurrent shoulder dislocation patients; 25 had arthroscopic surgery and 25 were open stabilisation procedure. For arthroscopic repair, the rate of recurrence was 32%, and for open stabilisation, it was 16%. Both groups had similar functional outcomes and quality of life. When considering surgical procedures to treat repeated shoulder dislocations, recurrence risks and functional outcomes must be balanced. Conclusion: Open stabilisation and arthroscopic repair give equivalent functional and quality of life outcomes for recurrent shoulder dislocations, however the later may increase recurrence risk. A patient’s anatomy and traits should be taken into account by surgeons when planning surgery.