Palaeoproteus miocenicus

? Palaeoproteus cf. miocenicus Figure 5 Material. Hambach 6C: one humerus (IPB-HaH 2390). Description. This humerus is rather large and robust. It misses only most of the distal epiphysis. The length of the preserved portion is about 16 mm. The bone expands strongly towards the epiphyses. Based on the preserved portion, it appears rather short. The proximal epiphysis is poorly ossified. It has an asymmetrical shape, more expanded toward the ventral side. The posterior surface displays a distinct fossa. Remarks. The size of this humerus suggests that it belongs to one of the two largest caudate taxa recognised in Hambach (i.e., either cryptobranchids or batrachosauroidids). The bone appears rather short in general appearance, which hints against Chelotriton, cryptobranchids, and possibly also proteids. Its shortness rather recalls the shortened limbs of P. klatti (see Vasilyan and Yanenko, 2020). Furthermore, the general morphology of the bone differs from the fragment of humerus attributed to Mioproteus gardneri Venczel and Codrea, 2018, whereas the poorly ossified proximal end hints against Chelotriton. Therefore, IPB-HaH 2390 is here attributed with doubt to the batrachosauroidid taxon found in the Hambach assemblage, Palaeoproteus cf. miocenicus.

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2024-12-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11033515
Primary Topic
Cell Image Analysis Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Palaeoproteus miocenicus

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Cell Image Analysis Techniques
article

Palaeoproteus miocenicus

article en

Abstract

? Palaeoproteus cf. miocenicus Figure 5 Material. Hambach 6C: one humerus (IPB-HaH 2390). Description. This humerus is rather large and robust. It misses only most of the distal epiphysis. The length of the preserved portion is about 16 mm. The bone expands strongly towards the epiphyses. Based on the preserved portion, it appears rather short. The proximal epiphysis is poorly ossified. It has an asymmetrical shape, more expanded toward the ventral side. The posterior surface displays a distinct fossa. Remarks. The size of this humerus suggests that it belongs to one of the two largest caudate taxa recognised in Hambach (i.e., either cryptobranchids or batrachosauroidids). The bone appears rather short in general appearance, which hints against Chelotriton, cryptobranchids, and possibly also proteids. Its shortness rather recalls the shortened limbs of P. klatti (see Vasilyan and Yanenko, 2020). Furthermore, the general morphology of the bone differs from the fragment of humerus attributed to Mioproteus gardneri Venczel and Codrea, 2018, whereas the poorly ossified proximal end hints against Chelotriton. Therefore, IPB-HaH 2390 is here attributed with doubt to the batrachosauroidid taxon found in the Hambach assemblage, Palaeoproteus cf. miocenicus.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 60%
Cell Image Analysis Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Palaeoproteus miocenicus · Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS