Name Consistency in LLM-based Machine Translation of Historical Texts

Large Language Models (LLMs) excel at translating 16th-century letters from Latin and Early New High German to modern English and German. While they perform well at translating well-known historical city names (e.g., Lutetia --> Paris), their ability to handle person names (e.g., Theodor Bibliander) or lesser-known toponyms (e.g., Augusta Vindelicorum --> Augsburg) remains unclear. This study investigates LLM-based translations of person and place names across various frequency bands in a corpus of 16th-century letters. Our results show that LLMs struggle with person names, achieving accuracies around 60%, but perform better with place names, reaching accuracies around 90%. We further demonstrate that including a translation suggestion for the proper noun in the prompt substantially boosts accuracy, yielding highly reliable results.

Publication Details

Journal
Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-279357
Primary Topic
Natural Language Processing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Name Consistency in LLM-based Machine Translation of Historical Texts

Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Natural Language Processing Techniques
article

Name Consistency in LLM-based Machine Translation of Historical Texts

article en

Abstract

Large Language Models (LLMs) excel at translating 16th-century letters from Latin and Early New High German to modern English and German. While they perform well at translating well-known historical city names (e.g., Lutetia --> Paris), their ability to handle person names (e.g., Theodor Bibliander) or lesser-known toponyms (e.g., Augusta Vindelicorum --> Augsburg) remains unclear. This study investigates LLM-based translations of person and place names across various frequency bands in a corpus of 16th-century letters. Our results show that LLMs struggle with person names, achieving accuracies around 60%, but perform better with place names, reaching accuracies around 90%. We further demonstrate that including a translation suggestion for the proper noun in the prompt substantially boosts accuracy, yielding highly reliable results.

Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 75%
Natural Language Processing Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.