Acceptability of Components for a Mandatory Quality Improvement Framework: A Survey Among Swiss General Practitioners

BACKGROUND In Switzerland, recently introduced legislation requires the implementation of a framework for mandatory quality improvement at the level of individual general practitioners (GPs) and includes the introduction of quality indicators (QIs) amongst other components. The GP-sided acceptance of potential components of such a framework is important to its success. OBJECTIVES To identify components of a potential framework for mandatory quality improvement that are most likely to be accepted by Swiss GPs. DESIGN Cross-sectional web-based survey conducted among employed and self-employed Swiss GPs in 2024. METHODS The survey was distributed to 1103 Swiss GPs via their physician networks. The survey inquired the acceptability of 62 possible components of a mandatory framework for quality improvement. Components were categorized as "acceptable" if they were rated as "acceptable" or "very acceptable" by more than 50% of participants, in contrast to those rated as "neutral" or "not acceptable." RESULTS A total of 244 GPs participated (participation rate 22.1%, 53.0% male, 51.2% <50 years old, 50.8% employed). The majority of participants rated 31 of the proposed 62 components as acceptable. Among these were QIs pertaining to structures and processes of care (rated as acceptable by 58.3%-83.4%) and sharing QI achievement data with peers from different group practices and physician networks (53.9%-92.2%). A majority of participants accepted physician networks, medical associations, and academic institutions as entities that could establish QIs and manage QI data (acceptance 62.1%-88.8%). CONCLUSIONS Swiss GPs appear to accept QIs that reflect structures and processes of care established by physician networks, medical associations or academic institutions, exclusively shared among their peers.

Publication Details

Journal
Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Published
2025-06-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-279111
Primary Topic
Species Distribution and Climate Change
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Acceptability of Components for a Mandatory Quality Improvement Framework: A Survey Among Swiss General Practitioners

Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Species Distribution and Climate Change
article

Acceptability of Components for a Mandatory Quality Improvement Framework: A Survey Among Swiss General Practitioners

article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND In Switzerland, recently introduced legislation requires the implementation of a framework for mandatory quality improvement at the level of individual general practitioners (GPs) and includes the introduction of quality indicators (QIs) amongst other components. The GP-sided acceptance of potential components of such a framework is important to its success. OBJECTIVES To identify components of a potential framework for mandatory quality improvement that are most likely to be accepted by Swiss GPs. DESIGN Cross-sectional web-based survey conducted among employed and self-employed Swiss GPs in 2024. METHODS The survey was distributed to 1103 Swiss GPs via their physician networks. The survey inquired the acceptability of 62 possible components of a mandatory framework for quality improvement. Components were categorized as "acceptable" if they were rated as "acceptable" or "very acceptable" by more than 50% of participants, in contrast to those rated as "neutral" or "not acceptable." RESULTS A total of 244 GPs participated (participation rate 22.1%, 53.0% male, 51.2% <50 years old, 50.8% employed). The majority of participants rated 31 of the proposed 62 components as acceptable. Among these were QIs pertaining to structures and processes of care (rated as acceptable by 58.3%-83.4%) and sharing QI achievement data with peers from different group practices and physician networks (53.9%-92.2%). A majority of participants accepted physician networks, medical associations, and academic institutions as entities that could establish QIs and manage QI data (acceptance 62.1%-88.8%). CONCLUSIONS Swiss GPs appear to accept QIs that reflect structures and processes of care established by physician networks, medical associations or academic institutions, exclusively shared among their peers.

Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Species Distribution and Climate Change
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Acceptability of Components for a Mandatory Quality Improvement Framework: A Survey Among Swiss General Practitioners · Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS