With great(er) power comes great(er) responsibility: an intercultural investigation of the effect of social roles on moral responsibility attribution

This paper investigates the relevance of social roles and hierarchies for the attribution of blame and causation in five culturally different countries, namely China, Germany, Poland, the United Arabic Emirates, and the United States of America. We demonstrate that in all these countries, hierarchical differences between the social roles occupied by two agents and associated differences in duties to care for others affect how these two agents are morally and causally judged when they make a decision together. Agents higher in a hierarchy are attributed more blame and considered more causally responsible for an action’s consequences. We also demonstrate that the degree of this effect depends on culture-specific differences in how hierarchies are conceived.

Publication Details

Journal
Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Published
2025-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5167/uzh-266106
Primary Topic
Wood and Agarwood Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

With great(er) power comes great(er) responsibility: an intercultural investigation of the effect of social roles on moral responsibility attribution

Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Wood and Agarwood Research
article

With great(er) power comes great(er) responsibility: an intercultural investigation of the effect of social roles on moral responsibility attribution

article en

Abstract

This paper investigates the relevance of social roles and hierarchies for the attribution of blame and causation in five culturally different countries, namely China, Germany, Poland, the United Arabic Emirates, and the United States of America. We demonstrate that in all these countries, hierarchical differences between the social roles occupied by two agents and associated differences in duties to care for others affect how these two agents are morally and causally judged when they make a decision together. Agents higher in a hierarchy are attributed more blame and considered more causally responsible for an action’s consequences. We also demonstrate that the degree of this effect depends on culture-specific differences in how hierarchies are conceived.

Zurich Open Repository and Archive (University of Zurich)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Wood and Agarwood Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.