How can the German Act on Corporate Due Diligence Obligations in Supply Chains provide an effective answer to human rights violations experienced by workers?

In 2013, the collapse of the Rana Plaza building in Bangladesh caused a massive uprise in discussions about mandatory human rights due diligence obligations and brands’ and retailers’ responsibility within supply chains of apparel production. Against this background, the German Act on Corporate Due Diligence Obligations in Supply Chains (LkSG) constitutes the German legislator’s attempt to establish a mandatory legal framework to prevent and mitigate human rights violations as well as to provide an answer to imminent and existing violations. This research scrutinized how the LkSG can provide an effective answer to human rights violations experienced by workers analyzing the case of the ready-made garment industry in Bangladesh. This choice of focus opened a perspective on a highly globalized and modularized industry where past attempts to improve workers’ rights brought very limited structural change. Bangladesh’s ready-made garment industry is defined by market despotism and a state captive to the interest of business. Furthermore, the brands’ and retailers’ purchasing practices heavily shape the industry. This research revealed that safeguarding fundamental human rights anchored in the LkSG is key to meet the workers’ needs. The strengths and weaknesses of the complaints mechanisms anchored in the legislation were investigated, revealing that they overall fall short of their potential to safeguard human rights. Additionally, the research assessed prevailing power asymmetries and approaches to counteract them, for instance mandatory collective bargaining, responsible purchasing practices and exit strategies. Finally, potentials for workers and their representatives to effectively apply the LkSG were emphasized, including capacity building, knowledge transfer, interpretation and legal struggles. In this regard, the importance of international solidarity for rightsholders’ improvements became apparent. Room for maneuver and possibilities to make further progress exist since the development of mandatory human rights due diligence is in a state of flux with the European Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive to be implemented gradually into national legislation and first measures due by 2027.

Publication Details

Published
2025-06-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.4393/opushwr-4481
Primary Topic
Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How can the German Act on Corporate Due Diligence Obligations in Supply Chains provide an effective answer to human rights violations experienced by workers?

Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
article

How can the German Act on Corporate Due Diligence Obligations in Supply Chains provide an effective answer to human rights violations experienced by workers?

article en

Abstract

In 2013, the collapse of the Rana Plaza building in Bangladesh caused a massive uprise in discussions about mandatory human rights due diligence obligations and brands’ and retailers’ responsibility within supply chains of apparel production. Against this background, the German Act on Corporate Due Diligence Obligations in Supply Chains (LkSG) constitutes the German legislator’s attempt to establish a mandatory legal framework to prevent and mitigate human rights violations as well as to provide an answer to imminent and existing violations. This research scrutinized how the LkSG can provide an effective answer to human rights violations experienced by workers analyzing the case of the ready-made garment industry in Bangladesh. This choice of focus opened a perspective on a highly globalized and modularized industry where past attempts to improve workers’ rights brought very limited structural change. Bangladesh’s ready-made garment industry is defined by market despotism and a state captive to the interest of business. Furthermore, the brands’ and retailers’ purchasing practices heavily shape the industry. This research revealed that safeguarding fundamental human rights anchored in the LkSG is key to meet the workers’ needs. The strengths and weaknesses of the complaints mechanisms anchored in the legislation were investigated, revealing that they overall fall short of their potential to safeguard human rights. Additionally, the research assessed prevailing power asymmetries and approaches to counteract them, for instance mandatory collective bargaining, responsible purchasing practices and exit strategies. Finally, potentials for workers and their representatives to effectively apply the LkSG were emphasized, including capacity building, knowledge transfer, interpretation and legal struggles. In this regard, the importance of international solidarity for rightsholders’ improvements became apparent. Room for maneuver and possibilities to make further progress exist since the development of mandatory human rights due diligence is in a state of flux with the European Corporate Sustainability Due Diligence Directive to be implemented gradually into national legislation and first measures due by 2027.

Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Global trade, sustainability, and social impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

How can the German Act on Corporate Due Diligence Obligations in Supply Chains provide an effective answer to human rights violations experienced by workers? · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS