The role of Forensic Anthropology in identifying human commingled remains: a literature review

Background: Forensic Anthropology is a critical tool in war crimes investigations, particularly in analyzing mass graves where human remains are often commingled and fragmented. It enables victims' identification while supporting human rights violations documentation [1-3]. This review focuses on the Minimum Number of Individuals (MNI), a central method for analyzing such remains. Objective: To examine the role of Forensic Anthropology in the investigation of mass graves, with a specific focus on MNI estimation, and to evaluate the methodologies applied to improve MNI accuracy and their implications for identification and legal outcomes. Methods: A systematic search was conducted from 2022 to 2025 in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Keywords included “war crimes”, “Forensic Anthropology”, “Bones”, “Mass disasters”, “Mass graves”, and “Minimum number of individuals”. Inclusion criteria were peer-reviewed research articles, full-text articles directly addressing the topic. Papers outside the timeframe or lacking methodological rigour were excluded. Sixteen studies were selected for review. Results: The 17 reviewed studies emphasized recurring challenges in estimating MNI in mass grave contexts. Most relied on traditional osteological methods—classifying bones by type, side, size, and morphology—to identify the minimum number of distinct individuals. Taphonomic factors such as decomposition and environmental exposure often hindered visual assessments. To increase precision, researchers used demographic indicators (e.g., age and sex) to differentiate remains. DNA analysis was applied as a complementary technique in complex cases involving damaged or incomplete bones. Though resource-intensive, molecular methods proved valuable in verifying or refining MNI estimates. The findings reflect the complexity of victim identification in mass graves and underscore the importance of integrating classical anthropological approaches with advanced technologies. Conclusions: MNI determination is essential for scientific and legal processes, since Forensic Anthropologists convert physical evidence into reliable documentation of atrocities, supporting justice and historical record.

Publication Details

Journal
Science Letters
Published
2025-05-03
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48797/sl.2025.297
Primary Topic
Subterranean biodiversity and taxonomy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The role of Forensic Anthropology in identifying human commingled remains: a literature review

Science Letters
Subterranean biodiversity and taxonomy
article

The role of Forensic Anthropology in identifying human commingled remains: a literature review

article en

Abstract

Background: Forensic Anthropology is a critical tool in war crimes investigations, particularly in analyzing mass graves where human remains are often commingled and fragmented. It enables victims' identification while supporting human rights violations documentation [1-3]. This review focuses on the Minimum Number of Individuals (MNI), a central method for analyzing such remains. Objective: To examine the role of Forensic Anthropology in the investigation of mass graves, with a specific focus on MNI estimation, and to evaluate the methodologies applied to improve MNI accuracy and their implications for identification and legal outcomes. Methods: A systematic search was conducted from 2022 to 2025 in PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science. Keywords included “war crimes”, “Forensic Anthropology”, “Bones”, “Mass disasters”, “Mass graves”, and “Minimum number of individuals”. Inclusion criteria were peer-reviewed research articles, full-text articles directly addressing the topic. Papers outside the timeframe or lacking methodological rigour were excluded. Sixteen studies were selected for review. Results: The 17 reviewed studies emphasized recurring challenges in estimating MNI in mass grave contexts. Most relied on traditional osteological methods—classifying bones by type, side, size, and morphology—to identify the minimum number of distinct individuals. Taphonomic factors such as decomposition and environmental exposure often hindered visual assessments. To increase precision, researchers used demographic indicators (e.g., age and sex) to differentiate remains. DNA analysis was applied as a complementary technique in complex cases involving damaged or incomplete bones. Though resource-intensive, molecular methods proved valuable in verifying or refining MNI estimates. The findings reflect the complexity of victim identification in mass graves and underscore the importance of integrating classical anthropological approaches with advanced technologies. Conclusions: MNI determination is essential for scientific and legal processes, since Forensic Anthropologists convert physical evidence into reliable documentation of atrocities, supporting justice and historical record.

Science Letters
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Subterranean biodiversity and taxonomy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The role of Forensic Anthropology in identifying human commingled remains: a literature review · Science Letters (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS