Analysis of endovascular treatment effects for anterior circulation large vessel occlusion caused by different etiologies

Objective To compare and analyze the clinical outcomes of endovascular treatment of anterior circulation large vessel occlusion (ac-LVO) caused by large artery atherosclerosis (LAA) and simple arterial embolization. Methods From August 2020 to September 2022, 87 patients with ac - LVO hospitalized in The Second Affiliated Hospital of Bengbu Medical University were enrolled. All patients were treated with endovascular treatment, including intravenous thrombolysis, stent thrombectomy, aspiration thrombectomy or angioplasty (balloon dilatation or stent implantation). According to intraoperative findings (etiology), they were divided into LAA group (n = 32) and simple arterial embolization group (embolization group, n = 55). The primary outcome was the 90 d modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score, and the secondary outcomes were postoperative vascular recanalization rate [modified Thrombolysis Cerebral Infarction (mTICI)] and incidence of symptomatic cerebral hemorrhage 1 d after surgery. Results The proportions of patients with atrial fibrillation (χ2 = 17.672, P = 0.000) and thrombus retrieval ≥ 3 times (χ2 = 10.606, P = 0.001) in the embolization group were higher than those in the LAA group, the proportion of intravenous thrombolysis in the embolization group was less than that in the LAA group (χ2 = 5.403, P = 0.020). However, the time from onset to operation (Z = 1.111, P = 0.267), the time from admission to operation (Z = 0.149, P = 0.882), preferred surgical approach for endovascular treatment (Fisher's exact probability: P = 0.153), as well as the rate of good prognosis (mRS score ≤ 2; χ2 = 0.004, P = 0.950) and mortality (χ2 = 0.035, P = 0.851) at 90 d after surgery, the rate of postoperative vascular recanalization (mTICI grade ≥ Ⅱb; χ2 = 0.033, P = 0.856) and symptomatic cerebral hemorrhage rate 1 d after surgery (χ2 = 0.345, P = 0.557) for the secondary outcome were observed in both groups, the above differences were not statistically significant. Conclusions The efficacy and prognosis of endovascular treatment of ac-LVO caused by LAA and simple arterial embolization has the same effect and clinical prognosis.