Long-interval intracortical inhibition to the biceps brachii is present during arm cycling but is not different than a position‑matched tonic contraction

Locomotor outputs are controlled by a combination of descending input, sensory feedback and networks of cells in the spinal cord called central pattern generators (CPGs). In the absence of descending input, sensory feedback and CPGs are able to produce rhythmic muscle activation, which create complex patterns of locomotor outputs such as crawling, swimming, walking, cycling. Arm cycling is used as a model of locomotion in order to examine various changes in neural excitability as humans require descending input in order to preform successful locomotion. The human nervous system is complex with many different pathways and tracts; one of which, the corticospinal tract, is involved in the voluntary control of human locomotion. Research investigating corticospinal excitability during arm cycling found that supraspinal excitability was greater during arm cycling than a position- and intensity-matched tonic contraction, yet the mechanism(s) are unclear. Various cortical circuits, such as short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) and interhemispheric inhibition (IHI), have been investigated. However, these results do not shed light on possible mechanisms for greater supraspinal excitability during arm cycling. Only one study assessed long-interval intracortical inhibition (LICI) during locomotion, but it was during leg cycling and did not assess task-dependency. To date, there has yet to be a study that has assessed LICI during arm cycling. Therefore, the purpose of the study was to determine if LICI is 1) present during arm cycling and 2) task-dependent. It was hypothesized that 1) LICI would be observed during arm cycling and 2) the amount of LICI would be less during arm cycling compared to a tonic contraction.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Memorial University Research Repository (Memorial University)
Published
2025-02-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48336/scm4-ef45
Primary Topic
Species Distribution and Climate Change
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Long-interval intracortical inhibition to the biceps brachii is present during arm cycling but is not different than a position‑matched tonic contraction

Memorial University Research Repository (Memorial University)
Species Distribution and Climate Change
article

Long-interval intracortical inhibition to the biceps brachii is present during arm cycling but is not different than a position‑matched tonic contraction

article en

Abstract

Locomotor outputs are controlled by a combination of descending input, sensory feedback and networks of cells in the spinal cord called central pattern generators (CPGs). In the absence of descending input, sensory feedback and CPGs are able to produce rhythmic muscle activation, which create complex patterns of locomotor outputs such as crawling, swimming, walking, cycling. Arm cycling is used as a model of locomotion in order to examine various changes in neural excitability as humans require descending input in order to preform successful locomotion. The human nervous system is complex with many different pathways and tracts; one of which, the corticospinal tract, is involved in the voluntary control of human locomotion. Research investigating corticospinal excitability during arm cycling found that supraspinal excitability was greater during arm cycling than a position- and intensity-matched tonic contraction, yet the mechanism(s) are unclear. Various cortical circuits, such as short-interval intracortical inhibition (SICI) and interhemispheric inhibition (IHI), have been investigated. However, these results do not shed light on possible mechanisms for greater supraspinal excitability during arm cycling. Only one study assessed long-interval intracortical inhibition (LICI) during locomotion, but it was during leg cycling and did not assess task-dependency. To date, there has yet to be a study that has assessed LICI during arm cycling. Therefore, the purpose of the study was to determine if LICI is 1) present during arm cycling and 2) task-dependent. It was hypothesized that 1) LICI would be observed during arm cycling and 2) the amount of LICI would be less during arm cycling compared to a tonic contraction.

Memorial University Research Repository (Memorial University)
Memorial University of Newfoundland (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Species Distribution and Climate Change
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.