Correlation of monocyte/high density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio with progression and prognosis of type 2 diabetic nephropathy

Objective To explore the relationship between monocyte/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (MHR) and the progression and prognosis of type 2 diabetic kidney disease (DKD). Methods From January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2022, 269 type 2 DKD patients were selected as DKD group while 269 healthy medical check-ups during the same period as healthy group. And the differences in MHR levels of two groups were compared. According to median MHR, DKD group were assigned into low-level MHR and high-level MHR sub-groups. General profiles, clinical data, the incidence rate of endpoint events and cumulative renal survival were compared two groups. Cox regression analysis was performed for exploring the independent risk factors for poor renal prognosis in DKD patients and drawing receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC) for exploring the diagnostic efficacy of MHR for poor prognosis of DKD. Results MHR level was higher in DKD group than that in healthy group [0.4918(0.3788,0.6818)×109/mmol vs 0.2984(0.1867,0.4112)×109/mmol] (P<0.05); high-level MHR group had higher levels of white blood cells (WBC) [7.70(6.40, 8.70)×109/L vs 6.50(5.40, 8.00)×109/L], neutrophils (Ne) [4.60(3.60, 5.53)×109/L vs 3.99(3.18, 5.19)×109/L] and monocyte (Mono) [0.69(0.60, 0.70)×109/L vs 0.50(0.40, 0.60)×109/L], urinary albumin to creatinine ratio (UACR) [1214.59(373.48, 3410.02)mg/g vs 1050.96(180.26, 3341.06) mg/g], 24 h urine protein (24 hUP) [3.21(1.42, 5.51)g vs 2.66 (0.58, 4.56) g], low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) [2.72(2.06, 3.40)mmol/L vs 2.23(1.63, 2.80)mmol/L], serum creatinine (Scr) [152.10(95.20, 221.60)μmol/L vs 126.00(92.48, 186.55)μmol/L] than those in low-level MHR group; lymphocyte (Lym) [1.60(1.27, 2.20)×109/L vs 1.82(1.30, 2.40)×109/L], high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) [0.94(0.83, 1.07)mmol/L vs 1.39(1.15, 1.65)mmol/L] and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) [39.69(25.19, 65.10)mL·min−1·(1.73 m²)−1 vs 47.12(28.86, 73.60)mL·min−1·(1.73 m²)−1] were lower than those in low-level MHR group; high-level MHR group had a cumulative kidney survival time and it was shorter than that in low level MHR group [63(39, 72)month vs 72(46, 72)month] (P<0.05); MHR was correlated positively with WBC, Ne, Mono, UACR, 24h UP, Scr and LDL-C (P<0.05) and negatively with Lym, HDL-C, eGFR and cumulative renal survival time (P<0.05); the incidence of endpoint events was higher in high-level MHR group than that in low-level MHR group (52.59% vs 38.06%)(P<0.05); baseline MHR [0.5492(0.4030, 0.7235)×109/mmol vs 0.4255(0.3117, 0.5134)×109/mmol], UACR [2062.65(752.80, 4234.80)mg/g vs 608.56(88.63. 1912.44)mg/g], 24 hUP [3.79(2.54, 5.53)g vs 1.58(0.39, 4.85)g] and Scr [178.40(134.00, 234.23)μmol/L vs 100.95(74.25, 152.10)μmol/L] were higher than those in DKD patients without endpoint events; eGFR was lower than that in DKD patients without endpoint events [33.45(23.33, 46.41)mL·min−1·(1.73 m²)−1 vs 61.59(38.57, 95.98)mL·min−1·(1.73 m²)−1](P<0.05). The results of Cox regression analysis indicated that MHR was an independent risk factor for a poor prognosis of DKD; The results of ROC curve showed that the area under the curve of MHR was 0.747 with a sensitivity of 0.820 and a specificity of 0.605. Conclusion DKD patients tend to have higher levels of MHR as compared with healthy individuals. As an independent risk for the progression of renal function in DKD patients, MHR has some diagnostic value for a poor prognosis of DKD. However, its specificity is not high.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2024-10-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1671-2390.2024.10.003
Primary Topic
Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Correlation of monocyte/high density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio with progression and prognosis of type 2 diabetic nephropathy

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
article

Correlation of monocyte/high density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio with progression and prognosis of type 2 diabetic nephropathy

article en

Abstract

Objective To explore the relationship between monocyte/high-density lipoprotein cholesterol ratio (MHR) and the progression and prognosis of type 2 diabetic kidney disease (DKD). Methods From January 1, 2017 to December 31, 2022, 269 type 2 DKD patients were selected as DKD group while 269 healthy medical check-ups during the same period as healthy group. And the differences in MHR levels of two groups were compared. According to median MHR, DKD group were assigned into low-level MHR and high-level MHR sub-groups. General profiles, clinical data, the incidence rate of endpoint events and cumulative renal survival were compared two groups. Cox regression analysis was performed for exploring the independent risk factors for poor renal prognosis in DKD patients and drawing receiver operator characteristic curve (ROC) for exploring the diagnostic efficacy of MHR for poor prognosis of DKD. Results MHR level was higher in DKD group than that in healthy group [0.4918(0.3788,0.6818)×109/mmol vs 0.2984(0.1867,0.4112)×109/mmol] (P<0.05); high-level MHR group had higher levels of white blood cells (WBC) [7.70(6.40, 8.70)×109/L vs 6.50(5.40, 8.00)×109/L], neutrophils (Ne) [4.60(3.60, 5.53)×109/L vs 3.99(3.18, 5.19)×109/L] and monocyte (Mono) [0.69(0.60, 0.70)×109/L vs 0.50(0.40, 0.60)×109/L], urinary albumin to creatinine ratio (UACR) [1214.59(373.48, 3410.02)mg/g vs 1050.96(180.26, 3341.06) mg/g], 24 h urine protein (24 hUP) [3.21(1.42, 5.51)g vs 2.66 (0.58, 4.56) g], low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) [2.72(2.06, 3.40)mmol/L vs 2.23(1.63, 2.80)mmol/L], serum creatinine (Scr) [152.10(95.20, 221.60)μmol/L vs 126.00(92.48, 186.55)μmol/L] than those in low-level MHR group; lymphocyte (Lym) [1.60(1.27, 2.20)×109/L vs 1.82(1.30, 2.40)×109/L], high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) [0.94(0.83, 1.07)mmol/L vs 1.39(1.15, 1.65)mmol/L] and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) [39.69(25.19, 65.10)mL·min−1·(1.73 m²)−1 vs 47.12(28.86, 73.60)mL·min−1·(1.73 m²)−1] were lower than those in low-level MHR group; high-level MHR group had a cumulative kidney survival time and it was shorter than that in low level MHR group [63(39, 72)month vs 72(46, 72)month] (P<0.05); MHR was correlated positively with WBC, Ne, Mono, UACR, 24h UP, Scr and LDL-C (P<0.05) and negatively with Lym, HDL-C, eGFR and cumulative renal survival time (P<0.05); the incidence of endpoint events was higher in high-level MHR group than that in low-level MHR group (52.59% vs 38.06%)(P<0.05); baseline MHR [0.5492(0.4030, 0.7235)×109/mmol vs 0.4255(0.3117, 0.5134)×109/mmol], UACR [2062.65(752.80, 4234.80)mg/g vs 608.56(88.63. 1912.44)mg/g], 24 hUP [3.79(2.54, 5.53)g vs 1.58(0.39, 4.85)g] and Scr [178.40(134.00, 234.23)μmol/L vs 100.95(74.25, 152.10)μmol/L] were higher than those in DKD patients without endpoint events; eGFR was lower than that in DKD patients without endpoint events [33.45(23.33, 46.41)mL·min−1·(1.73 m²)−1 vs 61.59(38.57, 95.98)mL·min−1·(1.73 m²)−1](P<0.05). The results of Cox regression analysis indicated that MHR was an independent risk factor for a poor prognosis of DKD; The results of ROC curve showed that the area under the curve of MHR was 0.747 with a sensitivity of 0.820 and a specificity of 0.605. Conclusion DKD patients tend to have higher levels of MHR as compared with healthy individuals. As an independent risk for the progression of renal function in DKD patients, MHR has some diagnostic value for a poor prognosis of DKD. However, its specificity is not high.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
First Affiliated Hospital of Shihezi University Medical College (CN)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 59%
Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.