Cost of capital for renewables and enabling technologies: Measuring the multidimensional heterogeneity in Switzerland

The cost of capital (CoC) is a critical parameter that significantly impacts the levelized costs of low-carbon energy technologies and cost-optimal decarbonization pathways. Nevertheless, empirical evidence on CoC differences between technologies and investor types is limited. Here, we study the heterogeneity among 11 technologies based on 193 CoC inputs from utilities, financial investors, and project developers in Switzerland. We find a wide range of CoC values across the technologies, averaging 3.6 % for small rooftop PV and 7.8 % for green hydrogen. Furthermore, we record an empirical variation of six percentage points even for assets of the same technology group, like solar PV, indicating differences between business models and investor types. Unlike neighboring countries that primarily rely on project finance for renewables, we find balance sheet financing to play an essential role for Swiss investors. Our results stress the need to differentiate CoC assumptions in energy system modeling and to consider not only technologies but also investor types and regional specificities as additional CoC dimensions.

Publication Details

Journal
Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich)
Published
2025-07-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000730944
Primary Topic
Species Distribution and Climate Change
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cost of capital for renewables and enabling technologies: Measuring the multidimensional heterogeneity in Switzerland

Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich)
Species Distribution and Climate Change
article

Cost of capital for renewables and enabling technologies: Measuring the multidimensional heterogeneity in Switzerland

article en

Abstract

The cost of capital (CoC) is a critical parameter that significantly impacts the levelized costs of low-carbon energy technologies and cost-optimal decarbonization pathways. Nevertheless, empirical evidence on CoC differences between technologies and investor types is limited. Here, we study the heterogeneity among 11 technologies based on 193 CoC inputs from utilities, financial investors, and project developers in Switzerland. We find a wide range of CoC values across the technologies, averaging 3.6 % for small rooftop PV and 7.8 % for green hydrogen. Furthermore, we record an empirical variation of six percentage points even for assets of the same technology group, like solar PV, indicating differences between business models and investor types. Unlike neighboring countries that primarily rely on project finance for renewables, we find balance sheet financing to play an essential role for Swiss investors. Our results stress the need to differentiate CoC assumptions in energy system modeling and to consider not only technologies but also investor types and regional specificities as additional CoC dimensions.

Repository for Publications and Research Data (ETH Zurich)
Bundesamt für Energie
Openalex Percentile: Top 56%
Species Distribution and Climate Change
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.