Effects of Palatability of Food on the Conditioning of Hunger in Rats

An experiment was conducted to study the association of foods of different levels of palatability and environmental events present during eating. Rats were exposed to different. foods in a start box and then allowed to run to a goal box containing food of a lesser or equal palatability. All animals showed a decrease in latency to eat in the start box and an increase in the amount of food consumed in the start box, with no significant differences in treatment groups at the end of conditioning. Although all groups, including the control group did run faster and eat more over days of conditioning, there were no significant differences in the motivation of the animals to run to food or the amount of food consumed in the goal box, as a function of the conditioning food. Apparently there were no lasting significant effects of the differences in palatability on the conditioning of hunger. These observations are discussed in terms of other literature showing an inconsistency of positive evidence for conditioned hunger.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ODU Digital Commons (Old Dominion University)
Published
2024-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25777/my67-p248
Primary Topic
Stress Responses and Cortisol
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of Palatability of Food on the Conditioning of Hunger in Rats

ODU Digital Commons (Old Dominion University)
Stress Responses and Cortisol
article

Effects of Palatability of Food on the Conditioning of Hunger in Rats

article en

Abstract

An experiment was conducted to study the association of foods of different levels of palatability and environmental events present during eating. Rats were exposed to different. foods in a start box and then allowed to run to a goal box containing food of a lesser or equal palatability. All animals showed a decrease in latency to eat in the start box and an increase in the amount of food consumed in the start box, with no significant differences in treatment groups at the end of conditioning. Although all groups, including the control group did run faster and eat more over days of conditioning, there were no significant differences in the motivation of the animals to run to food or the amount of food consumed in the goal box, as a function of the conditioning food. Apparently there were no lasting significant effects of the differences in palatability on the conditioning of hunger. These observations are discussed in terms of other literature showing an inconsistency of positive evidence for conditioned hunger.

ODU Digital Commons (Old Dominion University)
Dominion University College (GH), Old Dominion University (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Stress Responses and Cortisol
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.