Access to evidence: a matter of life and death for competition law class actions?

For several years, access to evidence has been identified by potential claimants as one of the main difficulties in bringing damages actions for breach of competition rules in general, and class actions in this area in particular, in the European Union. As regards the former, Directive 2014/104/EU addressed the issue, but established a number of exceptions, in particular with regard to documents in the possession of competition authorities, with the result that, in practice, injured parties may have to wait for the public decision to become final before bringing a (follow-on) action (and even then they still have to prove causation and quantify damages). In the case of collective actions, in particular opt-in models, the problem may be even more acute, and Directive 2020/1828, which addresses this issue in the context of collective actions, does not cover competition law actions. In this paper, we will analyse this problem in the light of European Union law, in particular the Directives and the recent case law of the European Court of Justice, as well as some illustrative national examples, in order to determine whether the current disclosure of evidence procedure undermines the effectiveness of the collective redress for competition rules.

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-04-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.34632/mclawreview.2025.17738
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.23
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Access to evidence: a matter of life and death for competition law class actions?

1 citations
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
2.23
article

Access to evidence: a matter of life and death for competition law class actions?

article en
1 citations

Abstract

For several years, access to evidence has been identified by potential claimants as one of the main difficulties in bringing damages actions for breach of competition rules in general, and class actions in this area in particular, in the European Union. As regards the former, Directive 2014/104/EU addressed the issue, but established a number of exceptions, in particular with regard to documents in the possession of competition authorities, with the result that, in practice, injured parties may have to wait for the public decision to become final before bringing a (follow-on) action (and even then they still have to prove causation and quantify damages). In the case of collective actions, in particular opt-in models, the problem may be even more acute, and Directive 2020/1828, which addresses this issue in the context of collective actions, does not cover competition law actions. In this paper, we will analyse this problem in the light of European Union law, in particular the Directives and the recent case law of the European Court of Justice, as well as some illustrative national examples, in order to determine whether the current disclosure of evidence procedure undermines the effectiveness of the collective redress for competition rules.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Dispute Resolution and Class Actions
2.23
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Access to evidence: a matter of life and death for competition law class actions? · SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS