Effects of Simultaneous Alarms on Resolution Heuristics

Automated signaling systems are frequently used to direct operator attention to potential hazards. Although these automated systems can lead to enhanced human performance, factors such as degraded alarm signal reliability and lack of trust can undermine the potential benefits of automation (Breznitz, 1984; Rice, 2009, Wickens & 2007). Additionally, work by Gilson, Mouloua, Graft, and McDonald (2001), as well as Keller and Rice (2009), suggest that an alarm contained within a larger array of alarms should not be evaluated individually. Due to the increasing use of multiple alarms in complex environments such as operating rooms and cockpits (Konkani, Oakley, & Bauld, 2012; Woods, Sarter, & Billings, 1997), it is important to identify reaction strategies that may and should be used when an unreliable alarm is in the presence of other alarms. Accordingly, the influence of reliability level and the number of additional activated alarms on objective trust, reaction time, and acceptance rate with a 12-alarm array was evaluated using a 2 x 12 split-plot factorial design. Overall a significant linear trend was observed in objective trust measures as the number of additional activated alarms (p & .001). This finding indicates the number of additional activated alarms, instead of the given alarm reliability, was used to calibrate objective trust. Reaction time was found to be quadratic (p & .001). Acceptance rate followed a cubic trend (p & .001), with significant quadratic (p = .02) and significant linear (p & .001) derivative trends. This suggests participant response changed from alarm dismissal to acceptance near 50% of alarm array activation. Finally, there was a significant effect of reliability level (p & .001) on acceptance rate, although no significance differences were found between the 50% and 75% groups. Overall, the results constitute evidence for an extension of probability matching theory based on percent system activation and indicate the need to minimize alarms in display design.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ODU Digital Commons (Old Dominion University)
Published
2024-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25777/byq0-fj51
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of Simultaneous Alarms on Resolution Heuristics

ODU Digital Commons (Old Dominion University)
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Effects of Simultaneous Alarms on Resolution Heuristics

article en

Abstract

Automated signaling systems are frequently used to direct operator attention to potential hazards. Although these automated systems can lead to enhanced human performance, factors such as degraded alarm signal reliability and lack of trust can undermine the potential benefits of automation (Breznitz, 1984; Rice, 2009, Wickens & 2007). Additionally, work by Gilson, Mouloua, Graft, and McDonald (2001), as well as Keller and Rice (2009), suggest that an alarm contained within a larger array of alarms should not be evaluated individually. Due to the increasing use of multiple alarms in complex environments such as operating rooms and cockpits (Konkani, Oakley, & Bauld, 2012; Woods, Sarter, & Billings, 1997), it is important to identify reaction strategies that may and should be used when an unreliable alarm is in the presence of other alarms. Accordingly, the influence of reliability level and the number of additional activated alarms on objective trust, reaction time, and acceptance rate with a 12-alarm array was evaluated using a 2 x 12 split-plot factorial design. Overall a significant linear trend was observed in objective trust measures as the number of additional activated alarms (p & .001). This finding indicates the number of additional activated alarms, instead of the given alarm reliability, was used to calibrate objective trust. Reaction time was found to be quadratic (p & .001). Acceptance rate followed a cubic trend (p & .001), with significant quadratic (p = .02) and significant linear (p & .001) derivative trends. This suggests participant response changed from alarm dismissal to acceptance near 50% of alarm array activation. Finally, there was a significant effect of reliability level (p & .001) on acceptance rate, although no significance differences were found between the 50% and 75% groups. Overall, the results constitute evidence for an extension of probability matching theory based on percent system activation and indicate the need to minimize alarms in display design.

ODU Digital Commons (Old Dominion University)
Dominion University College (GH), Old Dominion University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 49%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.