'Torture' in the Inter-American System—Evolving Interpretations and Intersectional Rights Protections

For her human rights capstone project, Gabi Holzer enrolled in the course LATINAM 252: “The Inter-American Human Rights System: Doctrine, Practice and Advocacy” and wrote a paper that traces the evolution of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights' interpretation of “torture,” emphasizing its eventual recognition of sexual violence as a form of torture under international law. Holzer examined how increased gender representation and intersectional awareness contributed to this shift, arguing that similar interpretive frameworks should extend to detention and migration contexts—particularly practices like solitary confinement and family separation. By analyzing key cases and legal definitions, the paper highlights how expanding the concept of torture can enhance protections for vulnerable populations and strengthen human rights jurisprudence in the Americas. The content of this capstone is only accessible to users who have a valid Stanford SUNet ID.

Publication Details

Journal
Stanford Digital Repository
Published
2025-06-27
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25740/ry087wv4104
Primary Topic
Torture, Ethics, and Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

'Torture' in the Inter-American System—Evolving Interpretations and Intersectional Rights Protections

Stanford Digital Repository
Torture, Ethics, and Law
article

'Torture' in the Inter-American System—Evolving Interpretations and Intersectional Rights Protections

article en

Abstract

For her human rights capstone project, Gabi Holzer enrolled in the course LATINAM 252: “The Inter-American Human Rights System: Doctrine, Practice and Advocacy” and wrote a paper that traces the evolution of the Inter-American Court of Human Rights' interpretation of “torture,” emphasizing its eventual recognition of sexual violence as a form of torture under international law. Holzer examined how increased gender representation and intersectional awareness contributed to this shift, arguing that similar interpretive frameworks should extend to detention and migration contexts—particularly practices like solitary confinement and family separation. By analyzing key cases and legal definitions, the paper highlights how expanding the concept of torture can enhance protections for vulnerable populations and strengthen human rights jurisprudence in the Americas. The content of this capstone is only accessible to users who have a valid Stanford SUNet ID.

Stanford Digital Repository
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Torture, Ethics, and Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.