Dynamic Pricing Regulation and Welfare in Insurance Markets

This paper examines the impact of dynamic pricing regulation on market outcomes and social welfare in the U.S. long-term care insurance (LTCI) market. We first provide descriptive evidence that the introduction of rate stability regulation, which limits insurers’ ability to increase premiums over the lifetime of a contract, improved rate stability while reducing product variety. To quantify this trade-off, we develop and estimate a dynamic equilibrium model of LTCI where insurers have market power and cannot commit to future premiums. Our estimates suggest that consumers’ demand for LTCI is relatively price inelastic. However, insurers do not charge a high markup due to various pricing regulations. Using the estimated model, we conduct counterfactual experiments to assess the welfare effect of dynamic pricing regulation. We find that a stricter rate stability regulation lowers social welfare as the benefit from improved rate stability is outweighed by the cost from reduced product variety.

Publication Details

Journal
Stanford Digital Repository
Published
2025-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25740/rn075rz0569
Primary Topic
Insurance and Financial Risk Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Dynamic Pricing Regulation and Welfare in Insurance Markets

Stanford Digital Repository
Insurance and Financial Risk Management
article

Dynamic Pricing Regulation and Welfare in Insurance Markets

article en

Abstract

This paper examines the impact of dynamic pricing regulation on market outcomes and social welfare in the U.S. long-term care insurance (LTCI) market. We first provide descriptive evidence that the introduction of rate stability regulation, which limits insurers’ ability to increase premiums over the lifetime of a contract, improved rate stability while reducing product variety. To quantify this trade-off, we develop and estimate a dynamic equilibrium model of LTCI where insurers have market power and cannot commit to future premiums. Our estimates suggest that consumers’ demand for LTCI is relatively price inelastic. However, insurers do not charge a high markup due to various pricing regulations. Using the estimated model, we conduct counterfactual experiments to assess the welfare effect of dynamic pricing regulation. We find that a stricter rate stability regulation lowers social welfare as the benefit from improved rate stability is outweighed by the cost from reduced product variety.

Stanford Digital Repository
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Insurance and Financial Risk Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.