Non-Price Competition and Risk Selection Through Hospital Networks

Insurer competition in hospital networks generates incentives for risk selection. I model this type of competition between insurers to understand the effect of risk adjustment and premium setting on hospital network breadth and consumer welfare. I use data from Colombia’s health care system to estimate the model. Every aspect of the Colombian national insurance plan is regulated by the government except for hospital networks, which insurers can choose separately for different services. I find that insurers risk-select by providing narrow networks in services that unprofitable patients demand the most. Eliminating risk adjustment reduces average network breadth by 6.7% and consumer welfare by 2.2%. Improving the risk adjustment formula increases average network breadth by 4.6%-28.0% and consumer welfare by 2.9%-8.0%, depending on how many risk factors are included. Price and non-price competition are substitutes for risk selection as a zero-premium policy exacerbates underprovision of insurance coverage. Results highlight hospital networks as an important dimension of non-price competition and cream-skimming in health care markets.

Publication Details

Journal
Stanford Digital Repository
Published
2025-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25740/bs173sc3205
Primary Topic
Healthcare Policy and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Non-Price Competition and Risk Selection Through Hospital Networks

Stanford Digital Repository
Healthcare Policy and Management
article

Non-Price Competition and Risk Selection Through Hospital Networks

article en

Abstract

Insurer competition in hospital networks generates incentives for risk selection. I model this type of competition between insurers to understand the effect of risk adjustment and premium setting on hospital network breadth and consumer welfare. I use data from Colombia’s health care system to estimate the model. Every aspect of the Colombian national insurance plan is regulated by the government except for hospital networks, which insurers can choose separately for different services. I find that insurers risk-select by providing narrow networks in services that unprofitable patients demand the most. Eliminating risk adjustment reduces average network breadth by 6.7% and consumer welfare by 2.2%. Improving the risk adjustment formula increases average network breadth by 4.6%-28.0% and consumer welfare by 2.9%-8.0%, depending on how many risk factors are included. Price and non-price competition are substitutes for risk selection as a zero-premium policy exacerbates underprovision of insurance coverage. Results highlight hospital networks as an important dimension of non-price competition and cream-skimming in health care markets.

Stanford Digital Repository
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 44%
Healthcare Policy and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Non-Price Competition and Risk Selection Through Hospital Networks · Stanford Digital Repository (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS