What Drives Variation in Investor Portfolios?Evidence from Retirement Plans

We document new patterns in investment behavior using a comprehensive dataset of 401(k) plans from 2009 through 2019. We show that there is substantial heterogeneity in asset allocation across plans, and that these differences are systematically predictable by sector of employment and demographic characteristics. For example, higher income and education is associated with more exposure to equities, while a greater share of minorities and retirees is associated with less equity exposure. These patterns cannot be rationalized by differences in investment options or plan participation. To understand observed investment behavior, we use a revealed preference approach that allows us to recover heterogeneity in investors’ (subjective) expectations and risk preferences. We find that differences in expectations play an important role in explaining portfolios. Further, we show that investors appear to form expectations based on local sources of information such as county-level GDP growth, home prices, and employer past performance. Overall, our findings are consistent with a model in which heterogeneity in investor expectations reflects idiosyncratic experiences and local environments.

Publication Details

Journal
Stanford Digital Repository
Published
2025-01-22
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25740/bt698rh6396
Primary Topic
Species Distribution and Climate Change
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What Drives Variation in Investor Portfolios?Evidence from Retirement Plans

Stanford Digital Repository
Species Distribution and Climate Change
article

What Drives Variation in Investor Portfolios?Evidence from Retirement Plans

article en

Abstract

We document new patterns in investment behavior using a comprehensive dataset of 401(k) plans from 2009 through 2019. We show that there is substantial heterogeneity in asset allocation across plans, and that these differences are systematically predictable by sector of employment and demographic characteristics. For example, higher income and education is associated with more exposure to equities, while a greater share of minorities and retirees is associated with less equity exposure. These patterns cannot be rationalized by differences in investment options or plan participation. To understand observed investment behavior, we use a revealed preference approach that allows us to recover heterogeneity in investors’ (subjective) expectations and risk preferences. We find that differences in expectations play an important role in explaining portfolios. Further, we show that investors appear to form expectations based on local sources of information such as county-level GDP growth, home prices, and employer past performance. Overall, our findings are consistent with a model in which heterogeneity in investor expectations reflects idiosyncratic experiences and local environments.

Stanford Digital Repository
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 67%
Species Distribution and Climate Change
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.