Effect of in situ immunization with vidutolimod in an oral leukoplakia model

Leukoplakia is the most common premalignancy in the oral cavity, with the syndrome of white patches or spots forming inside the mouth. The risk factors include chronic irritation such as smoking, alcohol consumption, and chewing betel nuts. The majority of oral squamous cell carcinomas (OSCCs) arise from oral leukoplakia. However, leukoplakia is insufficiently researched and both diagnosing and treating oral leukoplakia are still problematic issues; with diagnosis being highly subjective and treatments (e.g., watchful waiting, conservative drug therapies, and surgical removal) possessing limited efficacy. There are no biomarkers specific for leukoplakia and the diagnosis of leukoplakia highly depends on the pathologist’s analysis of the collected biopsy, which can introduce a lot of variances. Thus, further understanding and an effective therapy for leukoplakia are still highly desirable to lower the risk of recurrence and malignant transformation to oral leukoplakia.

Publication Details

Journal
Iowa Research Online (The University of Iowa)
Published
2024-11-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25820/etd.007597
Primary Topic
Oral Health Pathology and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effect of in situ immunization with vidutolimod in an oral leukoplakia model

Iowa Research Online (The University of Iowa)
Oral Health Pathology and Treatment
article

Effect of in situ immunization with vidutolimod in an oral leukoplakia model

article en

Abstract

Leukoplakia is the most common premalignancy in the oral cavity, with the syndrome of white patches or spots forming inside the mouth. The risk factors include chronic irritation such as smoking, alcohol consumption, and chewing betel nuts. The majority of oral squamous cell carcinomas (OSCCs) arise from oral leukoplakia. However, leukoplakia is insufficiently researched and both diagnosing and treating oral leukoplakia are still problematic issues; with diagnosis being highly subjective and treatments (e.g., watchful waiting, conservative drug therapies, and surgical removal) possessing limited efficacy. There are no biomarkers specific for leukoplakia and the diagnosis of leukoplakia highly depends on the pathologist’s analysis of the collected biopsy, which can introduce a lot of variances. Thus, further understanding and an effective therapy for leukoplakia are still highly desirable to lower the risk of recurrence and malignant transformation to oral leukoplakia.

Iowa Research Online (The University of Iowa)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Oral Health Pathology and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.