Psychological Wellbeing of University Academics: The Role of Personality Traits and Perceived Occupational Stress

This study examined how personality traits (introversion and extraversion) and perceived occupational stress predict psychological well-being among academic staff in a Nigerian university. A cross-sectional survey design was adopted with a total sample of 200 academic staff selected via stratified random sampling across faculties. Standardized instruments were used to measure psychological well-being, personality traits, and perceived occupational stress and hypotheses tested at 0.05 level of significance. Results showed that 43.5% of respondents had moderate psychological well-being, 29% had low well-being, and 27.5% had very high well-being. The statistical model used (multinomial logistic regression) was a good fit for predicting outcomes (χ²(12) = 94.22, p < .001; Nagelkerke R² = 0.57). Introverted staff were over three times more likely to report low well-being (OR = 3.21, 95% CI [1.89, 5.44]), while extraverted staff were more than twice as likely to report very high well-being (OR = 2.67, 95% CI [1.42, 5.03]). Staff who experienced moderate levels of stress were four times more likely to report average well-being (OR = 4.03, 95% CI [2.14, 7.59]). A chi-square test also confirmed that stress levels varied significantly across well-being categories (χ²(4) = 21.33, p = .002). These findings suggest that both personality and stress levels are important factors in determining how well academic staff cope emotionally. Supporting staff mental health requires attention to both individual personality differences and workplace stress conditions.

Publication Details

Journal
Psychology Archives
Published
2025-07-04
DOI
https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.16513
Primary Topic
Evolution and Paleontology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychological Wellbeing of University Academics: The Role of Personality Traits and Perceived Occupational Stress

Psychology Archives
Evolution and Paleontology Studies
article

Psychological Wellbeing of University Academics: The Role of Personality Traits and Perceived Occupational Stress

article en

Abstract

This study examined how personality traits (introversion and extraversion) and perceived occupational stress predict psychological well-being among academic staff in a Nigerian university. A cross-sectional survey design was adopted with a total sample of 200 academic staff selected via stratified random sampling across faculties. Standardized instruments were used to measure psychological well-being, personality traits, and perceived occupational stress and hypotheses tested at 0.05 level of significance. Results showed that 43.5% of respondents had moderate psychological well-being, 29% had low well-being, and 27.5% had very high well-being. The statistical model used (multinomial logistic regression) was a good fit for predicting outcomes (χ²(12) = 94.22, p < .001; Nagelkerke R² = 0.57). Introverted staff were over three times more likely to report low well-being (OR = 3.21, 95% CI [1.89, 5.44]), while extraverted staff were more than twice as likely to report very high well-being (OR = 2.67, 95% CI [1.42, 5.03]). Staff who experienced moderate levels of stress were four times more likely to report average well-being (OR = 4.03, 95% CI [2.14, 7.59]). A chi-square test also confirmed that stress levels varied significantly across well-being categories (χ²(4) = 21.33, p = .002). These findings suggest that both personality and stress levels are important factors in determining how well academic staff cope emotionally. Supporting staff mental health requires attention to both individual personality differences and workplace stress conditions.

Psychology Archives
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Evolution and Paleontology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.