Objectified but not Materialized Theory: Human Waste Diagrams Under Erasure

This article questions the degrees of objectification and materialization of theory in material culture studies. It does so by examining the transformations and travelings of human waste diagrams, from a critique of economic externalities in sub-Saharan Africa to a tool of nonsewered sanitation planning in Southeast Asia, particularly in Indonesia: How can a theory become a scientific object but it rarely matters (e.g. turning into matters of concern/care and transforming into material artifacts)? This article firstly follows the moments in the 1990s to 2000s when a waste theory based on an accounting of flows and leakages of excrement and money was objectified as new knowledge abstracted from postcolonial cities in Western Africa, where the sewer network coverage is very low or non-existent. It then continues with what happened when the diagram's latest version—Shit Flow Diagram—was translated from English to Indonesian and its components were applied, adapted, and ignored in Indonesia and a new element in the diagram, the chain, was introduced and became a synecdoche of the waste theory. It concludes with a reflection on the limit of diagrams and the salient operation of erasure in the objectification of waste theory therein.

Publication Details

Journal
edoc Publication server (Humboldt University of Berlin)
Published
2025-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18452/33162
Primary Topic
Water Governance and Infrastructure
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Objectified but not Materialized Theory: Human Waste Diagrams Under Erasure

edoc Publication server (Humboldt University of Berlin)
Water Governance and Infrastructure
article

Objectified but not Materialized Theory: Human Waste Diagrams Under Erasure

article en

Abstract

This article questions the degrees of objectification and materialization of theory in material culture studies. It does so by examining the transformations and travelings of human waste diagrams, from a critique of economic externalities in sub-Saharan Africa to a tool of nonsewered sanitation planning in Southeast Asia, particularly in Indonesia: How can a theory become a scientific object but it rarely matters (e.g. turning into matters of concern/care and transforming into material artifacts)? This article firstly follows the moments in the 1990s to 2000s when a waste theory based on an accounting of flows and leakages of excrement and money was objectified as new knowledge abstracted from postcolonial cities in Western Africa, where the sewer network coverage is very low or non-existent. It then continues with what happened when the diagram's latest version—Shit Flow Diagram—was translated from English to Indonesian and its components were applied, adapted, and ignored in Indonesia and a new element in the diagram, the chain, was introduced and became a synecdoche of the waste theory. It concludes with a reflection on the limit of diagrams and the salient operation of erasure in the objectification of waste theory therein.

edoc Publication server (Humboldt University of Berlin)
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Water Governance and Infrastructure
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Objectified but not Materialized Theory: Human Waste Diagrams Under Erasure · edoc Publication server (Humboldt University of Berlin) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS