Revisiting stativity in pictorial narratives

This paper revisits the issue of stativity in pictorial narratives, specifically those found in comics and manga. The standard model holds that the contents of a picture, as defined by geometric projection, are semantically stative and integrated via a Dowty-style narrative interpretation. Here, I propose an alternative interpretation of pictorial narratives. Under this account, most pictorial narrative cases remain stative, as is posited in Abusch. When pictorial narratives include movement lines, however, additional supplemental content generates an eventive interpretation of pictorial representations. This is not pragmatically enriched content. The content contributed by movement lines is treated as semantic because movement lines are non-veridical in the way projection-style pictorial interpretations must be. Ultimately I argue for a dynamic, non-stative interpretation of pictorial narratives that include movement lines.

Publication Details

Journal
Open Journal Systems (Global Science & Technology Forum)
Published
2024-12-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18148/sub/2024.v28.1144
Primary Topic
Narrative Theory and Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Revisiting stativity in pictorial narratives

Open Journal Systems (Global Science & Technology Forum)
Narrative Theory and Analysis
article

Revisiting stativity in pictorial narratives

article en

Abstract

This paper revisits the issue of stativity in pictorial narratives, specifically those found in comics and manga. The standard model holds that the contents of a picture, as defined by geometric projection, are semantically stative and integrated via a Dowty-style narrative interpretation. Here, I propose an alternative interpretation of pictorial narratives. Under this account, most pictorial narrative cases remain stative, as is posited in Abusch. When pictorial narratives include movement lines, however, additional supplemental content generates an eventive interpretation of pictorial representations. This is not pragmatically enriched content. The content contributed by movement lines is treated as semantic because movement lines are non-veridical in the way projection-style pictorial interpretations must be. Ultimately I argue for a dynamic, non-stative interpretation of pictorial narratives that include movement lines.

Open Journal Systems (Global Science & Technology Forum)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Narrative Theory and Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.