This Land Was Made For You and Me: Evaluating the Relationship Between Undergraduates’ Sense of Belonging and Political Participation

<span style="font-weight: 400;">As politics takes a forefront in daily conversations, understanding political participation (or lack thereof) is increasingly important. College students are a particularly interesting population due to their inherent recency to the political sphere and susceptibility to social norms (Shulman &amp; Levine, 2012; Renstr&ouml;m et al., 2021). Social norms may impact political participation through feelings of belonging, in particular. Social acceptance by following social norms is a significant predictor of belonging, which has shown to be associated with better perceptions of education experience (Freeman et al., 2007; Maluenda-Albornoz, et al., 2022). Students who feel they belong to their university may experience more motivation for participation (Maluenda-Albornoz, et al., 2022). I hypothesized that a student&rsquo;s sense of belonging would be associated with political activity, political interest, and political interaction. I employed a survey design that included reliable and valid scales of belonging, school belonging, political efficacy, activism, and behaviors. Using a sample of college students (</span><em><span style="font-weight: 400;">N</span></em><span style="font-weight: 400;">=186) from North Carolina, I found that both general belonging and school belonging significantly predicted external political efficacy when controlling for political ideology. Political ideology also moderated this effect. Further analysis should explore other interpersonal variables that could affect college students' political participation.</span>

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNC Libraries
Published
2025-06-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17615/pdpe-3t05
Primary Topic
Social Media and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

This Land Was Made For You and Me: Evaluating the Relationship Between Undergraduates’ Sense of Belonging and Political Participation

UNC Libraries
Social Media and Politics
article

This Land Was Made For You and Me: Evaluating the Relationship Between Undergraduates’ Sense of Belonging and Political Participation

article en

Abstract

<span style="font-weight: 400;">As politics takes a forefront in daily conversations, understanding political participation (or lack thereof) is increasingly important. College students are a particularly interesting population due to their inherent recency to the political sphere and susceptibility to social norms (Shulman &amp; Levine, 2012; Renstr&ouml;m et al., 2021). Social norms may impact political participation through feelings of belonging, in particular. Social acceptance by following social norms is a significant predictor of belonging, which has shown to be associated with better perceptions of education experience (Freeman et al., 2007; Maluenda-Albornoz, et al., 2022). Students who feel they belong to their university may experience more motivation for participation (Maluenda-Albornoz, et al., 2022). I hypothesized that a student&rsquo;s sense of belonging would be associated with political activity, political interest, and political interaction. I employed a survey design that included reliable and valid scales of belonging, school belonging, political efficacy, activism, and behaviors. Using a sample of college students (</span><em><span style="font-weight: 400;">N</span></em><span style="font-weight: 400;">=186) from North Carolina, I found that both general belonging and school belonging significantly predicted external political efficacy when controlling for political ideology. Political ideology also moderated this effect. Further analysis should explore other interpersonal variables that could affect college students' political participation.</span>

UNC Libraries
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
Social Media and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.