Defining Value in Population Health: Evaluating Program Impact and Outcomes; Investigating the Equity of Patient Portals in the United States Healthcare System

As digital tools become more embedded in healthcare, their potential to improve outcomes is often tempered by concerns about equity. My capstone and STS research both examine how digital health innovations can either promote or hinder equitable care, focusing on definitions of value, implementation challenges, and stakeholder experiences. The capstone project evaluates UVA Health’s Interactive Home Monitoring program, which supports recently discharged patients through remote monitoring, proactive outreach, and patient engagement strategies. Using a mixed methods approach, we analyzed hospital data on readmissions, emergency department visits, and length of stay, alongside interviews with patients, clinicians, and program leaders. Patients enrolled in the program experienced significantly fewer readmissions and emergency department visits. Interviews revealed that patients valued emotional reassurance and feeling cared for, while health professionals emphasized education and access to services. However, data inconsistencies and a lack of formal evaluation metrics limited the ability to assess impact comprehensively. We recommended incorporating new outcome measures such as emotional support ratings and monitoring adherence to better capture program value. In parallel, my STS research investigates disparities in patient portal access using Actor Network Theory. A structured literature review was used to trace how patients, providers, developers, and policymakers interact within the sociotechnical system of digital health. Although patient portals are intended to empower users, they often reinforce existing inequities, particularly for older adults, rural populations, and those with limited digital access. Actor Network Theory made visible the complex network relationships that influence access and use. Together, these projects highlight the need for both technical refinement and sociotechnical sensitivity in designing equitable digital health systems.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Libra
Published
2025-05-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18130/gnx8-e973
Primary Topic
Electronic Health Records Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Defining Value in Population Health: Evaluating Program Impact and Outcomes; Investigating the Equity of Patient Portals in the United States Healthcare System

Libra
Electronic Health Records Systems
article

Defining Value in Population Health: Evaluating Program Impact and Outcomes; Investigating the Equity of Patient Portals in the United States Healthcare System

article en

Abstract

As digital tools become more embedded in healthcare, their potential to improve outcomes is often tempered by concerns about equity. My capstone and STS research both examine how digital health innovations can either promote or hinder equitable care, focusing on definitions of value, implementation challenges, and stakeholder experiences. The capstone project evaluates UVA Health’s Interactive Home Monitoring program, which supports recently discharged patients through remote monitoring, proactive outreach, and patient engagement strategies. Using a mixed methods approach, we analyzed hospital data on readmissions, emergency department visits, and length of stay, alongside interviews with patients, clinicians, and program leaders. Patients enrolled in the program experienced significantly fewer readmissions and emergency department visits. Interviews revealed that patients valued emotional reassurance and feeling cared for, while health professionals emphasized education and access to services. However, data inconsistencies and a lack of formal evaluation metrics limited the ability to assess impact comprehensively. We recommended incorporating new outcome measures such as emotional support ratings and monitoring adherence to better capture program value. In parallel, my STS research investigates disparities in patient portal access using Actor Network Theory. A structured literature review was used to trace how patients, providers, developers, and policymakers interact within the sociotechnical system of digital health. Although patient portals are intended to empower users, they often reinforce existing inequities, particularly for older adults, rural populations, and those with limited digital access. Actor Network Theory made visible the complex network relationships that influence access and use. Together, these projects highlight the need for both technical refinement and sociotechnical sensitivity in designing equitable digital health systems.

Libra
University of Virginia (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Electronic Health Records Systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Defining Value in Population Health: Evaluating Program Impact and Outcomes; Investigating the Equity of Patient Portals in the United States Healthcare System · Libra (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS