James Tyrrell, John Locke, and Patriarcha non Monarcha (1681)

In June 1681, Richard Janeway published Patriarcha non Monarcha, a pseudonymous attack on the works of Sir Robert Filmer, the author of Patriarcha: or The Natural Power of Kings. The author of Patriarcha non Monarcha was James Tyrrell (1642–1719), a close friend and correspondent of John Locke (1632–1704), whose own Two Treatises of Government (1690) would bear a marked resemblance to Patriarcha non Monarcha. In the decades since the appearance of Peter Laslett’s critical edition (1960) of Locke’s Two Treatises, these resemblances have formed the subject of an unusual debate about the nature of Tyrrell’s and Locke’s intellectual exchanges during the period when both were writing confutations of Filmer. In the work of Richard Tuck and David Wootton, Patriarcha non Monarcha is shown to possess a remarkable significance in the textual history of the Two Treatises. The article revisits this debate in the light of significant new evidence. In particular, the article examines a series of provocative claims about the arrangement of printed gatherings — or “collation” — of Patriarcha non Monarcha itself.

Publication Details

Journal
Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Published
2025-03-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17863/cam.116538
Primary Topic
Historical Philosophy and Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

James Tyrrell, John Locke, and Patriarcha non Monarcha (1681)

Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Historical Philosophy and Science
article

James Tyrrell, John Locke, and Patriarcha non Monarcha (1681)

article en

Abstract

In June 1681, Richard Janeway published Patriarcha non Monarcha, a pseudonymous attack on the works of Sir Robert Filmer, the author of Patriarcha: or The Natural Power of Kings. The author of Patriarcha non Monarcha was James Tyrrell (1642–1719), a close friend and correspondent of John Locke (1632–1704), whose own Two Treatises of Government (1690) would bear a marked resemblance to Patriarcha non Monarcha. In the decades since the appearance of Peter Laslett’s critical edition (1960) of Locke’s Two Treatises, these resemblances have formed the subject of an unusual debate about the nature of Tyrrell’s and Locke’s intellectual exchanges during the period when both were writing confutations of Filmer. In the work of Richard Tuck and David Wootton, Patriarcha non Monarcha is shown to possess a remarkable significance in the textual history of the Two Treatises. The article revisits this debate in the light of significant new evidence. In particular, the article examines a series of provocative claims about the arrangement of printed gatherings — or “collation” — of Patriarcha non Monarcha itself.

Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Historical Philosophy and Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

James Tyrrell, John Locke, and Patriarcha non Monarcha (1681) · Apollo (University of Cambridge) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS