Breaking the Cycle: Rethinking Rehabilitation for Repeat Offenders in State Prisons

This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of fostering recidivist inmates in Detention Homes (RUTAN) in an effort to prevent the recurrence of criminal acts. Using normative research methods with a qualitative approach, this study examines the implementation of coaching programs, the differences in coaching between recidivist and non-recidivist inmates, and the obstacles faced. The results of the study show that the coaching of recidivist inmates in prisons has not been fully effective in preventing recidivism. Factors such as population density, lack of individualized rehabilitation programs, limited resources, social stigma, and weak coordination between institutions are major challenges. Even though it has a strong legal foundation, its implementation still faces various obstacles. A more comprehensive and integrated approach is needed, including improving programs in RUTAN, strengthening post-release support, and increasing the role of the community in the reintegration process to increase the effectiveness of training recidivist inmates.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding
Published
2024-08-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v11i8.5961
Primary Topic
Legal and Social Justice Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Breaking the Cycle: Rethinking Rehabilitation for Repeat Offenders in State Prisons

International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding
Legal and Social Justice Studies
article

Breaking the Cycle: Rethinking Rehabilitation for Repeat Offenders in State Prisons

article en

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of fostering recidivist inmates in Detention Homes (RUTAN) in an effort to prevent the recurrence of criminal acts. Using normative research methods with a qualitative approach, this study examines the implementation of coaching programs, the differences in coaching between recidivist and non-recidivist inmates, and the obstacles faced. The results of the study show that the coaching of recidivist inmates in prisons has not been fully effective in preventing recidivism. Factors such as population density, lack of individualized rehabilitation programs, limited resources, social stigma, and weak coordination between institutions are major challenges. Even though it has a strong legal foundation, its implementation still faces various obstacles. A more comprehensive and integrated approach is needed, including improving programs in RUTAN, strengthening post-release support, and increasing the role of the community in the reintegration process to increase the effectiveness of training recidivist inmates.

International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding
Universitas Muhammadiyah Parepare (ID), Universitas Muslim Indonesia (ID)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 32%
Legal and Social Justice Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Breaking the Cycle: Rethinking Rehabilitation for Repeat Offenders in State Prisons · International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS