A Comparison of Coronavirus Fusion Mechanisms

Coronavirus spike glycoproteins play a crucial role in attachment to and subsequent fusion with target cells. The single-virus fusion assay was used to explore the effects of factors including concentration of exogenous fusion-triggering protease, spike conformation, and spike sequence on fusion of SARS-CoV-2 and other related coronaviruses. SARS-CoV-2 fusion was studied in-depth. The virus was found to have invariable kinetics across a wide range of concentrations of spike-activating protease and between different proteases, suggesting that subsequent conformational changes in spike protein structure, rather than proteolytic processing of spike, is the rate-determining step of membrane fusion. Additionally, it was found that the simultaneous addition of soluble ACE2 receptor along with protease sped up the viral fusion process, suggesting that binding of spike to ACE2 receptor promotes a conformational state that is more fusion-ready than unbound spike. Fusion kinetics of viruses sampled across the coronavirus family were then compared to SARSCoV-2. Kinetics were indistinguishable between samples except in particles expressing HCoV-NL63 spike, which was found to undergo fusion significantly faster. Examination of spike sequences revealed that a network of cooperating amino acids, rather than a single point mutation, is likely responsible for this increase in kinetics. Gel electrophoresis was used to determine if differences in proteolytic processing are contributing factors to the observed differences in fusion kinetics. It was found that SARS-CoV-2 spike was more susceptible to proteolysis than that of HCoV-NL63 despite undergoing fusion at a slower rate, further suggesting that conformational changes taking place post-proteolysis are the rate-limiting step of fusion.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Libra
Published
2025-07-25
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18130/btbf-h205
Primary Topic
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Comparison of Coronavirus Fusion Mechanisms

Libra
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
article

A Comparison of Coronavirus Fusion Mechanisms

article en

Abstract

Coronavirus spike glycoproteins play a crucial role in attachment to and subsequent fusion with target cells. The single-virus fusion assay was used to explore the effects of factors including concentration of exogenous fusion-triggering protease, spike conformation, and spike sequence on fusion of SARS-CoV-2 and other related coronaviruses. SARS-CoV-2 fusion was studied in-depth. The virus was found to have invariable kinetics across a wide range of concentrations of spike-activating protease and between different proteases, suggesting that subsequent conformational changes in spike protein structure, rather than proteolytic processing of spike, is the rate-determining step of membrane fusion. Additionally, it was found that the simultaneous addition of soluble ACE2 receptor along with protease sped up the viral fusion process, suggesting that binding of spike to ACE2 receptor promotes a conformational state that is more fusion-ready than unbound spike. Fusion kinetics of viruses sampled across the coronavirus family were then compared to SARSCoV-2. Kinetics were indistinguishable between samples except in particles expressing HCoV-NL63 spike, which was found to undergo fusion significantly faster. Examination of spike sequences revealed that a network of cooperating amino acids, rather than a single point mutation, is likely responsible for this increase in kinetics. Gel electrophoresis was used to determine if differences in proteolytic processing are contributing factors to the observed differences in fusion kinetics. It was found that SARS-CoV-2 spike was more susceptible to proteolysis than that of HCoV-NL63 despite undergoing fusion at a slower rate, further suggesting that conformational changes taking place post-proteolysis are the rate-limiting step of fusion.

Libra
University of Virginia (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 47%
SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A Comparison of Coronavirus Fusion Mechanisms · Libra (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS