A Story of Two Holy Grails: How Artificial Intelligence Will Change the Design and Use of Corporate Insolvency Law

When I started to engage with artificial intelligence (AI) in the context of law, Måns Magnusson, professor of statistics at Uppsala University, asked the lawyers in the room: ‘What is the holy grail of lawyers? What is the best thing we could do using artificial intelligence in law?’ At the time, my answer was: ‘Predicting what a court will decide.’ With this answer, I did not only intend to capture the situation, in which parties face court litigation. I also meant ‘knowing the law’, in other words, knowing the legal consequences of actions and events should a court be invited to apply the law. What other holy grail could there be than anticipating legal outcomes as a result of decisions, independent of whether such decisions were actually judged in court or – as in most of the cases – part of bargaining in the shadow of the law.

Publication Details

Journal
Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Published
2024-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17863/cam.113108
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A Story of Two Holy Grails: How Artificial Intelligence Will Change the Design and Use of Corporate Insolvency Law

Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Artificial Intelligence in Law
article

A Story of Two Holy Grails: How Artificial Intelligence Will Change the Design and Use of Corporate Insolvency Law

article en

Abstract

When I started to engage with artificial intelligence (AI) in the context of law, Måns Magnusson, professor of statistics at Uppsala University, asked the lawyers in the room: ‘What is the holy grail of lawyers? What is the best thing we could do using artificial intelligence in law?’ At the time, my answer was: ‘Predicting what a court will decide.’ With this answer, I did not only intend to capture the situation, in which parties face court litigation. I also meant ‘knowing the law’, in other words, knowing the legal consequences of actions and events should a court be invited to apply the law. What other holy grail could there be than anticipating legal outcomes as a result of decisions, independent of whether such decisions were actually judged in court or – as in most of the cases – part of bargaining in the shadow of the law.

Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
Artificial Intelligence in Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.