“PROVISIONAL BEINGS”: CROWDS, RACE, & THE BIOPOLITICS OF LYNCHING IN AMERICAN LITERATURE, 1890-1915

This dissertation is about two types of mass human aggregation that were materially and figurally significant for U.S. cultural discourse at the turn of the century: crowds and populations. Specifically, “Provisional Beings” argues that crowds and populations combined in this era to forge a mass racial imaginary—a symbolic system meant to construct and maintain racialized distinctions through the coordination of contrasting aggregate forms. While many Americans—and especially White Americans committed to racial segregation—felt that indicators of racial difference were slipping away at the level of individual bodies, the comprehensive capture performed by tabulating the population promised to (re)surface these otherwise submerged signs of identity. This mass racial imaginary found its quintessential expression in the act of lynching. As a horrifically widespread and public form of mass violence, lynching saw the era’s paradigmatically race-based crowd—the lynch mob—rally together in an attempt both to instantiate and protect the so-called purity of the White population by brutalizing a Black individual situated to stand in for and make tractable the putatively threatening Black population as a whole. Lynching thus operated as a crucial convergence zone—a deadly intersection through which crowds and populations were meant to cross over and into one another as reciprocally supporting concepts. It is due to this overdetermined significance that the lynch mob is the focus of my three chapters. Literary accounts of lynching register this desire to stabilize race on the basis of bridging an impossible gap between crowds and populations. And precisely because this gap is unbridgeable, these same literary accounts also reveal the myriad paradoxes and problems that arise to splinter apart the segregationist dream of the mass racial imaginary. Through my analysis of texts by Charles Chesnutt, Stephen Crane, Ida B. Wells, Mark Twain, W. E. B. Du Bois, Kelly Miller, Thomas Dixon, James Weldon Johnson, and George Schuyler, lynching is shown to produce not only counterintuitive but antithetical racial outcomes.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNC Libraries
Published
2024-09-13
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17615/ks7c-k640
Primary Topic
American Literature and Humor Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

“PROVISIONAL BEINGS”: CROWDS, RACE, & THE BIOPOLITICS OF LYNCHING IN AMERICAN LITERATURE, 1890-1915

UNC Libraries
American Literature and Humor Studies
article

“PROVISIONAL BEINGS”: CROWDS, RACE, & THE BIOPOLITICS OF LYNCHING IN AMERICAN LITERATURE, 1890-1915

article en

Abstract

This dissertation is about two types of mass human aggregation that were materially and figurally significant for U.S. cultural discourse at the turn of the century: crowds and populations. Specifically, “Provisional Beings” argues that crowds and populations combined in this era to forge a mass racial imaginary—a symbolic system meant to construct and maintain racialized distinctions through the coordination of contrasting aggregate forms. While many Americans—and especially White Americans committed to racial segregation—felt that indicators of racial difference were slipping away at the level of individual bodies, the comprehensive capture performed by tabulating the population promised to (re)surface these otherwise submerged signs of identity. This mass racial imaginary found its quintessential expression in the act of lynching. As a horrifically widespread and public form of mass violence, lynching saw the era’s paradigmatically race-based crowd—the lynch mob—rally together in an attempt both to instantiate and protect the so-called purity of the White population by brutalizing a Black individual situated to stand in for and make tractable the putatively threatening Black population as a whole. Lynching thus operated as a crucial convergence zone—a deadly intersection through which crowds and populations were meant to cross over and into one another as reciprocally supporting concepts. It is due to this overdetermined significance that the lynch mob is the focus of my three chapters. Literary accounts of lynching register this desire to stabilize race on the basis of bridging an impossible gap between crowds and populations. And precisely because this gap is unbridgeable, these same literary accounts also reveal the myriad paradoxes and problems that arise to splinter apart the segregationist dream of the mass racial imaginary. Through my analysis of texts by Charles Chesnutt, Stephen Crane, Ida B. Wells, Mark Twain, W. E. B. Du Bois, Kelly Miller, Thomas Dixon, James Weldon Johnson, and George Schuyler, lynching is shown to produce not only counterintuitive but antithetical racial outcomes.

UNC Libraries
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 36%
American Literature and Humor Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.