HANKSSON

HANK Sufficient Statistics Out of Norway (HANKSSON) answers a core question of the heterogeneity in macroeconomics literature: does heterogeneity amplify the aggregate effects of demand policies and shocks? We provide two sufficient statistics (SS) and test them using individual-level matched data for personal characteristics, income, wealth and non-imputed, actual consumption for the Norwegian population. The first SS gauges whether heterogeneity drives a wedge between the (representative agent) average MPC and a model-consistent (heterogeneous agent) aggregate MPC. The second SS elicits whether the consumption of constrained, "hand-to-mouth," agents is more exposed to aggregate fluctuations. Our key finding is that to analyze aggregate behavior, one does not need to keep track of heterogeneity: the average and the aggregate are about the same. We show that the amplification result currently prevalent in the literature is due to using labor earnings and is overturned when using model-consistent disposable income. This is due to the strong insurance effect of taxes and transfers; when applied to our data, even the much less progressive US tax and transfer system produces no amplification due to heterogeneity. The same “close to irrelevance” conclusion arises based on the second statistic using consumption data directly. Not even during the Great Recession do we see heterogeneity contribute meaningfully to demand shock amplification.

Publication Details

Journal
Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Published
2025-03-28
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17863/cam.118368
Primary Topic
Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

HANKSSON

Apollo (University of Cambridge)
Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
article

HANKSSON

article en

Abstract

HANK Sufficient Statistics Out of Norway (HANKSSON) answers a core question of the heterogeneity in macroeconomics literature: does heterogeneity amplify the aggregate effects of demand policies and shocks? We provide two sufficient statistics (SS) and test them using individual-level matched data for personal characteristics, income, wealth and non-imputed, actual consumption for the Norwegian population. The first SS gauges whether heterogeneity drives a wedge between the (representative agent) average MPC and a model-consistent (heterogeneous agent) aggregate MPC. The second SS elicits whether the consumption of constrained, "hand-to-mouth," agents is more exposed to aggregate fluctuations. Our key finding is that to analyze aggregate behavior, one does not need to keep track of heterogeneity: the average and the aggregate are about the same. We show that the amplification result currently prevalent in the literature is due to using labor earnings and is overturned when using model-consistent disposable income. This is due to the strong insurance effect of taxes and transfers; when applied to our data, even the much less progressive US tax and transfer system produces no amplification due to heterogeneity. The same “close to irrelevance” conclusion arises based on the second statistic using consumption data directly. Not even during the Great Recession do we see heterogeneity contribute meaningfully to demand shock amplification.

Apollo (University of Cambridge)
No poverty
Openalex Percentile: Top 40%
Financial Literacy, Pension, Retirement Analysis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.