Regulatory considerations on physical anatomical models

This presentation serves as an introduction to regulatory issues regarding physical anatomical models in the medical field. Application areas such as product development, operation planning and diagnostic purposes will be reviewed. Currently, there is no clear guidance regarding the regulatory qualification and risk classification of such physical anatomical models in the EU. According to the Regulation (EU) 2017/745 (“MDR”), such anatomical models might be classified as class I devices. In the USA, they are classified as class II devices according to a software related rule which has been adapted in 2021. The FDA pursue the approach that a physical anatomical model that was produced by using a picture and communication system according to this rule will be classified correspondingly as class II device. In Australia, an individual rule was introduced in 2021 classifying anatomical models as class IIa devices. According to this rule, a physical anatomical model itself is classified similar to the classification of radiology related products that are considered as class IIa device. Another interesting aspect is how to handle in-house manufacturing of the anatomical models by a health facility for such purposes. From a logistic and medical point of view, manufacturing anatomical models at the point-of-care has several advantages. However, regulatory challenges with regard to the responsibilities and accountabilities of the different parties for the various steps from the design and development to the production and use of medical device production systems (“MDPS”) have to be resolved. Potential regulatory concepts will be discussed from an international and EU perspective. The presentation will focus on the current regulatory discussion regarding personalized and simulated patient diagnostics and treatment.

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Infinite Science GmbH
Published
2025-05-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.18416/ammm.2025.25062366
Primary Topic
Anatomy and Medical Technology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Regulatory considerations on physical anatomical models

Infinite Science GmbH
Anatomy and Medical Technology
article

Regulatory considerations on physical anatomical models

article en

Abstract

This presentation serves as an introduction to regulatory issues regarding physical anatomical models in the medical field. Application areas such as product development, operation planning and diagnostic purposes will be reviewed. Currently, there is no clear guidance regarding the regulatory qualification and risk classification of such physical anatomical models in the EU. According to the Regulation (EU) 2017/745 (“MDR”), such anatomical models might be classified as class I devices. In the USA, they are classified as class II devices according to a software related rule which has been adapted in 2021. The FDA pursue the approach that a physical anatomical model that was produced by using a picture and communication system according to this rule will be classified correspondingly as class II device. In Australia, an individual rule was introduced in 2021 classifying anatomical models as class IIa devices. According to this rule, a physical anatomical model itself is classified similar to the classification of radiology related products that are considered as class IIa device. Another interesting aspect is how to handle in-house manufacturing of the anatomical models by a health facility for such purposes. From a logistic and medical point of view, manufacturing anatomical models at the point-of-care has several advantages. However, regulatory challenges with regard to the responsibilities and accountabilities of the different parties for the various steps from the design and development to the production and use of medical device production systems (“MDPS”) have to be resolved. Potential regulatory concepts will be discussed from an international and EU perspective. The presentation will focus on the current regulatory discussion regarding personalized and simulated patient diagnostics and treatment.

Infinite Science GmbH
Zentrum für Qualität in der Pflege (DE), Technical University of Applied Sciences Lübeck (DE)
Partnerships for the goals, Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Anatomy and Medical Technology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Regulatory considerations on physical anatomical models · Infinite Science GmbH (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS