Investigating stress, community support, and kinship in LGBTQ+ family formation in the US South

<span style="font-weight: 400;">Research on the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ+) community has illustrated that queer individuals experience unique, and sometimes inequitable, experiences within healthcare and legal spaces. Previous research has also established that this extends to disparities with family formation, where LGBTQ+ people are challenged by access to assisted reproductive technologies (ART), legal obstacles, and psychosocial stress. However, less research has investigated how these disparities are contextualized by the geographic, social, and political environment of specific regions of the United States. Using semi-structured interviews with individuals living in North Carolina and Georgia, this research explores how stress and community support influence the family formation processes of LGBTQ+ individuals in the U.S. South over the past two decades. Participant interviews focus on three key groups: queer people currently planning a family, queer parents, and practitioners who are involved in queer family planning. Results shed light on the challenges that LGBTQ+ individuals face when forming a family, including emotional stress, biological limitations, legal barriers, and social discrimination. Despite this, participants expressed that community support can mitigate some of the stress created by these obstacles. These results also suggest an increased need for cultural competency training in healthcare, more equitable insurance coverage for fertility care, and inclusive family laws.</span>

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
UNC Libraries
Published
2025-06-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17615/wyd6-9629
Primary Topic
Reproductive Health and Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigating stress, community support, and kinship in LGBTQ+ family formation in the US South

UNC Libraries
Reproductive Health and Technologies
article

Investigating stress, community support, and kinship in LGBTQ+ family formation in the US South

article en

Abstract

<span style="font-weight: 400;">Research on the lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ+) community has illustrated that queer individuals experience unique, and sometimes inequitable, experiences within healthcare and legal spaces. Previous research has also established that this extends to disparities with family formation, where LGBTQ+ people are challenged by access to assisted reproductive technologies (ART), legal obstacles, and psychosocial stress. However, less research has investigated how these disparities are contextualized by the geographic, social, and political environment of specific regions of the United States. Using semi-structured interviews with individuals living in North Carolina and Georgia, this research explores how stress and community support influence the family formation processes of LGBTQ+ individuals in the U.S. South over the past two decades. Participant interviews focus on three key groups: queer people currently planning a family, queer parents, and practitioners who are involved in queer family planning. Results shed light on the challenges that LGBTQ+ individuals face when forming a family, including emotional stress, biological limitations, legal barriers, and social discrimination. Despite this, participants expressed that community support can mitigate some of the stress created by these obstacles. These results also suggest an increased need for cultural competency training in healthcare, more equitable insurance coverage for fertility care, and inclusive family laws.</span>

UNC Libraries
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 43%
Reproductive Health and Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.