AI In Criminal Justice: Implications For Justice, Fairness, and Potential Biases

This article examines the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on justice, fairness, and bias in the criminal justice system. While AI tools such as predictive policing, risk assessment, and automated sentencing promise enhanced efficiency and accuracy, they also pose significant challenges. These technologies, often trained on biased historical data, can inadvertently reinforce discrimination, disproportionately affecting marginalized groups. The article explores algorithmic biases, focusing on how issues in data collection, training, and deployment can lead to unequal treatment based on race, gender, and socioeconomic status. Case studies highlight instances of biased outcomes, emphasizing the need for bias mitigation strategies. It also addresses the ethical and legal implications of AI in criminal justice, stressing the importance of transparency, accountability, and regulatory oversight. Recommendations include bias detection measures, diverse stakeholder involvement, and ethical guidelines to ensure AI use aligns with justice and fairness. This article aims to guide policymakers and researchers in developing balanced, equitable AI applications that uphold justice and protect individual rights.

Publication Details

Journal
Knowledge Commons (Lakehead University)
Published
2024-09-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17613/nw6a-1c38
Primary Topic
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

AI In Criminal Justice: Implications For Justice, Fairness, and Potential Biases

Knowledge Commons (Lakehead University)
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
article

AI In Criminal Justice: Implications For Justice, Fairness, and Potential Biases

article en

Abstract

This article examines the impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on justice, fairness, and bias in the criminal justice system. While AI tools such as predictive policing, risk assessment, and automated sentencing promise enhanced efficiency and accuracy, they also pose significant challenges. These technologies, often trained on biased historical data, can inadvertently reinforce discrimination, disproportionately affecting marginalized groups. The article explores algorithmic biases, focusing on how issues in data collection, training, and deployment can lead to unequal treatment based on race, gender, and socioeconomic status. Case studies highlight instances of biased outcomes, emphasizing the need for bias mitigation strategies. It also addresses the ethical and legal implications of AI in criminal justice, stressing the importance of transparency, accountability, and regulatory oversight. Recommendations include bias detection measures, diverse stakeholder involvement, and ethical guidelines to ensure AI use aligns with justice and fairness. This article aims to guide policymakers and researchers in developing balanced, equitable AI applications that uphold justice and protect individual rights.

Knowledge Commons (Lakehead University)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.