Imran Nazar Hosein's Interpretation of the End Times: Rudolf Bultmann's Hermeneutical Analysis of Demythology

This article critically examines the interpretative methodology of Imran Nazar Hosein, evaluating whether his interpretations are grounded in a coherent epistemological framework or primarily driven by intuitive reflection. The analysis draws on Rudolf Bultmann's hermeneutic theory of demythology as a comparative lens, given its focus on reinterpreting mythological elements to address existential concerns, particularly in the context of discussions about the future rather than historical facts. The research employs a literature-based approach, utilizing primary sources such as Hosein's works on eschatology and Bultmann's writings on demythology, alongside secondary sources from relevant academic literature. The findings reveal notable methodological parallels between Hosein's interpretations and Bultmann's demythologization, particularly in their shared use of hermeneutic techniques. However, a key distinction lies in their epistemological foundations: while Bultmann approaches the New Testament through a Christian existentialist lens, Hosein's interpretations are deeply

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Knowledge Commons (Lakehead University)
Published
2025-06-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17613/bsncg-6kw51
Primary Topic
Religion, Theology, History, Judaism, Christianity
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Imran Nazar Hosein's Interpretation of the End Times: Rudolf Bultmann's Hermeneutical Analysis of Demythology

Knowledge Commons (Lakehead University)
Religion, Theology, History, Judaism, Christianity
article

Imran Nazar Hosein's Interpretation of the End Times: Rudolf Bultmann's Hermeneutical Analysis of Demythology

article en

Abstract

This article critically examines the interpretative methodology of Imran Nazar Hosein, evaluating whether his interpretations are grounded in a coherent epistemological framework or primarily driven by intuitive reflection. The analysis draws on Rudolf Bultmann's hermeneutic theory of demythology as a comparative lens, given its focus on reinterpreting mythological elements to address existential concerns, particularly in the context of discussions about the future rather than historical facts. The research employs a literature-based approach, utilizing primary sources such as Hosein's works on eschatology and Bultmann's writings on demythology, alongside secondary sources from relevant academic literature. The findings reveal notable methodological parallels between Hosein's interpretations and Bultmann's demythologization, particularly in their shared use of hermeneutic techniques. However, a key distinction lies in their epistemological foundations: while Bultmann approaches the New Testament through a Christian existentialist lens, Hosein's interpretations are deeply

Knowledge Commons (Lakehead University)
Instituto Brasileiro de Informação em Ciência e Tecnologia (BR), Instituto Brasileiro de Museus (BR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 48%
Religion, Theology, History, Judaism, Christianity
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Imran Nazar Hosein's Interpretation of the End Times: Rudolf Bultmann's Hermeneutical Analysis of Demythology · Knowledge Commons (Lakehead University) (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS