Psychological Factors in Research Data Management

Data sharing and open science are increasingly emphasized as a means to increase transparency and reproducibility in science. Despite the consensus on the importance of research data management (RDM), the public availability of data sets remains limited, and researchers often fail to share data upon request. This study explores the psychological mechanisms underlying RDM intentions, using the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) as a framework. TPB, a prominent theory in psychology, links beliefs about behavior to intentions and actual behavior, taking into account attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control. This paper applies the theory to RDM, addressing the ambivalence researchers experience towards data sharing, characterized by simultaneous positive and negative evaluations. Empirical analysis of a reused data set supports the existence of ambivalent attitudes towards data sharing. Furthermore, we provide insights from psychological literature as well as anecdotal evidence from practical RDM-service experience to discuss all three factors (attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control). To address these factors in practice, we propose strategies for RDM staff and institutions, that emphasize transparent communication, supportive environments, and practical resources that pave the way for good RDM. However, addressing psychological factors concerning data publication can only overcome a small part of barriers to data sharing, and structural changes are needed first.

Publication Details

Journal
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.17192/bfdm.2025.1.8736
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Research Data Management Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.25
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Psychological Factors in Research Data Management

1 citations
SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Research Data Management Practices
3.25
article

Psychological Factors in Research Data Management

article en
1 citations

Abstract

Data sharing and open science are increasingly emphasized as a means to increase transparency and reproducibility in science. Despite the consensus on the importance of research data management (RDM), the public availability of data sets remains limited, and researchers often fail to share data upon request. This study explores the psychological mechanisms underlying RDM intentions, using the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) as a framework. TPB, a prominent theory in psychology, links beliefs about behavior to intentions and actual behavior, taking into account attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control. This paper applies the theory to RDM, addressing the ambivalence researchers experience towards data sharing, characterized by simultaneous positive and negative evaluations. Empirical analysis of a reused data set supports the existence of ambivalent attitudes towards data sharing. Furthermore, we provide insights from psychological literature as well as anecdotal evidence from practical RDM-service experience to discuss all three factors (attitudes, subjective norms, and perceived behavioral control). To address these factors in practice, we propose strategies for RDM staff and institutions, that emphasize transparent communication, supportive environments, and practical resources that pave the way for good RDM. However, addressing psychological factors concerning data publication can only overcome a small part of barriers to data sharing, and structural changes are needed first.

SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Research Data Management Practices
3.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.