The fourth APSTAR evaluation report

This evaluation aims to provide a review of the Applied Population Studies Training (APSTAR) programme to ascertain the extent to which it is achieving its objective of addressing the limited institutional and technical capacity for demographic analysis in the context of South Africa. The employees and students of APSTAR were interviewed to establish the corrective measures put into place to address the issues highlighted in previous evaluation reports whilst also identifying any other gaps that may be present within the program. From previous reports, the main criticisms of the program were the lack of synergy between modules; repetition of information between modules; and the subjectivity of the program content by the facilitator. APSTAR has corrected these issues by hosting a workshop in collaboration with the United Nations to create synergy without repetition and to draw up templates for modules to ensure uniformity. Along with the evaluation of various source documents and interviews with programme stakeholders, this review highlights the basic structure, management, administration and accreditation of the programme. It also provides an overview of the marketing for APSTAR and the criteria for selection of students and facilitators. This report confirms that APSTAR is a successful programme, which has made great strides in integrating population issues into development in South Africa. This is evidenced by an overwhelming positive response obtained from a number of current and former students coupled with the response from employers of APSTAR graduates. Students have emphasised the excellent tuition offered by APSTAR while employers mentioned the improved productivity they received from graduates.

Publication Details

Journal
Figshare
Published
2025-06-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14749/29389682
Primary Topic
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The fourth APSTAR evaluation report

Figshare
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
article

The fourth APSTAR evaluation report

article en

Abstract

This evaluation aims to provide a review of the Applied Population Studies Training (APSTAR) programme to ascertain the extent to which it is achieving its objective of addressing the limited institutional and technical capacity for demographic analysis in the context of South Africa. The employees and students of APSTAR were interviewed to establish the corrective measures put into place to address the issues highlighted in previous evaluation reports whilst also identifying any other gaps that may be present within the program. From previous reports, the main criticisms of the program were the lack of synergy between modules; repetition of information between modules; and the subjectivity of the program content by the facilitator. APSTAR has corrected these issues by hosting a workshop in collaboration with the United Nations to create synergy without repetition and to draw up templates for modules to ensure uniformity. Along with the evaluation of various source documents and interviews with programme stakeholders, this review highlights the basic structure, management, administration and accreditation of the programme. It also provides an overview of the marketing for APSTAR and the criteria for selection of students and facilitators. This report confirms that APSTAR is a successful programme, which has made great strides in integrating population issues into development in South Africa. This is evidenced by an overwhelming positive response obtained from a number of current and former students coupled with the response from employers of APSTAR graduates. Students have emphasised the excellent tuition offered by APSTAR while employers mentioned the improved productivity they received from graduates.

Figshare
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 45%
Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.