Results of the correlation analyses.
<p>(A) Characters vs. substrate (woodboring), with <i>Rhimphoctona</i> (Campopleginae) as originally coded as a woodborer; (B) Characters vs. substrate (woodboring), with <i>Rhimphoctona</i> (Campopleginae) not coded as a woodborer; (C) Characters vs. character correlated with the substrate (see above), with <i>Rhimphoctona</i> (Campopleginae) as originally coded as a woodborer. The two model, dependent and independent are presented with the two runs, and the Bayes factor (BF) for each the two runs is presented. A calculation of the average of the two BF results is also provided. Number preceding the parenthesis refers to the numbering in Supplemental S1, while the one in parenthesis reflects the number of the character in Bennet et al. [<a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0311365#pone.0311365.ref001" target="_blank">1</a>].</p> <p>(DOCX)</p>
Publication Details
- Journal
- Figshare
- Published
- 2024-09-30
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0311365.s007
- Primary Topic
- Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00